![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a question about some nuances of the Bendix/King KAP 140 autopilot.
Since the ink is still wet on my IFR rating (actually I have not even gotten the new one in the mail yet!) I am working on a personal "post checkride" syllabus. Part of this self training is to fly different routes on an IFR clearance in VMC using the autopilot. In all my VFR days I never touched the thing and was not allowed to use it during my IFR training. While I am serious about keeping my hand flying skills sharp, I also want to know how to use the autopilot. After reading the manufacturer's "Pilot's Guide" cover to cover I noticed a rather odd procedure when using the AP in conjunction with a DG. When you select NAV the AP temporarily flashes HDG to remind you to set the Heading Bug to the same course as set on the OBS. I do this and everything works fine but I want to understand WHY you do this. What algorithm is the autopilot is using? How does it uses the Heading bug info in conjunction with the OBS and CDI? I noticed that once I am tracking a radial if I change the HDG bug the aircraft turns. My mental model has the autopilot just using the CDI deflection and OBS setting to hold a course, but obviously I am missing something. If anyone can point me to some more detailed information on how the AP uses the Heading Bug while in NAV or APR mode I would appreciate it. thanks Martin Van Ryswyk PPSEL Instrument |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
By setting the heading bug and the OBS to the same course you are mimicking
a HSI. The data out of the OBS is only course deviation, it doesn't output the course that is set on the dial. If the numbers on the OBS were covered up and I turned the knob to a randome course, you would have a difficult time flying that course. You might eventually figure it out, but you also might make a bunch of 90 degree intercepts first. By setting both, you are telling it what the desired course is (HDG) and the current deviation from that course (CDI). Life is simpler with an HSI which combines the DG and OBS onto one instrument...highly recommended. Mike MU-2 "News" wrote in message .. . I have a question about some nuances of the Bendix/King KAP 140 autopilot. Since the ink is still wet on my IFR rating (actually I have not even gotten the new one in the mail yet!) I am working on a personal "post checkride" syllabus. Part of this self training is to fly different routes on an IFR clearance in VMC using the autopilot. In all my VFR days I never touched the thing and was not allowed to use it during my IFR training. While I am serious about keeping my hand flying skills sharp, I also want to know how to use the autopilot. After reading the manufacturer's "Pilot's Guide" cover to cover I noticed a rather odd procedure when using the AP in conjunction with a DG. When you select NAV the AP temporarily flashes HDG to remind you to set the Heading Bug to the same course as set on the OBS. I do this and everything works fine but I want to understand WHY you do this. What algorithm is the autopilot is using? How does it uses the Heading bug info in conjunction with the OBS and CDI? I noticed that once I am tracking a radial if I change the HDG bug the aircraft turns. My mental model has the autopilot just using the CDI deflection and OBS setting to hold a course, but obviously I am missing something. If anyone can point me to some more detailed information on how the AP uses the Heading Bug while in NAV or APR mode I would appreciate it. thanks Martin Van Ryswyk PPSEL Instrument |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
First of all, thank you for your responses.
I want to make sure I understand what you are saying. The AP only gets one piece of information from the CDI... the equivalent of the left/right deflection of the needle. It is not getting the OBS setting. This piece of information comes from the heading bug. When tracking a radial, though, it would seem the OBS setting will tell you the desired heading. Also, the manual instructs you to always set the heading bug to the same value as the OBS. Intercepting the course works because when you first select NAV and the HDG message flashes you set the HDG bug to the OBS setting, then it basically ignores the HDG for a while and either uses the current heading (all angles intercept) or computes a 45 deg intercept. Again, if the AP had the OBS setting and the current heading, it could figure this out. It seems to me this may be a cost issue. The way it is now the AP only needs the following inputs: Current Heading Heading Bug CDI deflection If it was able to follow a course from the CDI/OBS alone it would need an additional input. Thank you for all the responses. martin "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message k.net... By setting the heading bug and the OBS to the same course you are mimicking a HSI. The data out of the OBS is only course deviation, it doesn't output the course that is set on the dial. If the numbers on the OBS were covered up and I turned the knob to a randome course, you would have a difficult time flying that course. You might eventually figure it out, but you also might make a bunch of 90 degree intercepts first. By setting both, you are telling it what the desired course is (HDG) and the current deviation from that course (CDI). Life is simpler with an HSI which combines the DG and OBS onto one instrument...highly recommended. Mike MU-2 "News" wrote in message .. . I have a question about some nuances of the Bendix/King KAP 140 autopilot. Since the ink is still wet on my IFR rating (actually I have not even gotten the new one in the mail yet!) I am working on a personal "post checkride" syllabus. Part of this self training is to fly different routes on an IFR clearance in VMC using the autopilot. In all my VFR days I never touched the thing and was not allowed to use it during my IFR training. While I am serious about keeping my hand flying skills sharp, I also want to know how to use the autopilot. After reading the manufacturer's "Pilot's Guide" cover to cover I noticed a rather odd procedure when using the AP in conjunction with a DG. When you select NAV the AP temporarily flashes HDG to remind you to set the Heading Bug to the same course as set on the OBS. I do this and everything works fine but I want to understand WHY you do this. What algorithm is the autopilot is using? How does it uses the Heading bug info in conjunction with the OBS and CDI? I noticed that once I am tracking a radial if I change the HDG bug the aircraft turns. My mental model has the autopilot just using the CDI deflection and OBS setting to hold a course, but obviously I am missing something. If anyone can point me to some more detailed information on how the AP uses the Heading Bug while in NAV or APR mode I would appreciate it. thanks Martin Van Ryswyk PPSEL Instrument |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
News wrote:
snip What algorithm is the autopilot is using? How does it uses the Heading bug info in conjunction with the OBS and CDI? I noticed that once I am tracking a radial if I change the HDG bug the aircraft turns. My mental model has the autopilot just using the CDI deflection and OBS setting to hold a course, but obviously I am missing something. If anyone can point me to some more detailed information on how the AP uses the Heading Bug while in NAV or APR mode I would appreciate it. I don't have specific experience with the KAP140, but it sounds like it may work just like a couple of other ones I have used. I think you understand how it works in HDG mode, right? There is an error signal from the heading bug, and the aircraft is turned so as to correct the error. In NAV mode, the CDI error is (conceptually) added to the heading error, so that the effective zero-error heading will be slightly off the heading bug setting when the CDI is not centered. In a crosswind, theoretically the aircraft will track a course offset from the radial on the downwind side, with a heading offset into the wind. The CDI will be offset upwind, and the heading flown will be offset into the wind from the heading bug. In other words, it doesn't track the center of the radial, it tracks just enough off to the side so that the error signal from the CDI plus the error signal from the heading bug cancel each other. Dave Remove SHIRT to reply directly. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As a 300 hour user of a KAP140 I would caution you on several things
depending on the plane its fitted to. The short list of gotchas a Easy to inadvertantly fly an ILS instead of a GPS if you mistune the NAV receiver Because its pitch information is based on rate of climb , mountain waves, buump clouds, thermals can cause significant airspeed and pitch chnage attitudes, including stalling the plane! Inadvertant engagement of the AP on teh ground can cause uncontrollable trim excursions If you tweak a nav system whilst its connected it may appear to be connecte dto teh njav solution but its actually disenegaged apart from thats its fine! PS make sure you can hand fly in real iFR when it lets go! peter "Dave Butler" wrote in message ... News wrote: snip What algorithm is the autopilot is using? How does it uses the Heading bug info in conjunction with the OBS and CDI? I noticed that once I am tracking a radial if I change the HDG bug the aircraft turns. My mental model has the autopilot just using the CDI deflection and OBS setting to hold a course, but obviously I am missing something. If anyone can point me to some more detailed information on how the AP uses the Heading Bug while in NAV or APR mode I would appreciate it. I don't have specific experience with the KAP140, but it sounds like it may work just like a couple of other ones I have used. I think you understand how it works in HDG mode, right? There is an error signal from the heading bug, and the aircraft is turned so as to correct the error. In NAV mode, the CDI error is (conceptually) added to the heading error, so that the effective zero-error heading will be slightly off the heading bug setting when the CDI is not centered. In a crosswind, theoretically the aircraft will track a course offset from the radial on the downwind side, with a heading offset into the wind. The CDI will be offset upwind, and the heading flown will be offset into the wind from the heading bug. In other words, it doesn't track the center of the radial, it tracks just enough off to the side so that the error signal from the CDI plus the error signal from the heading bug cancel each other. Dave Remove SHIRT to reply directly. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Bondar ) wrote:
As a fellow few hundred hour KAP140 user, I have a couple of comments: Easy to inadvertantly fly an ILS instead of a GPS if you mistune the NAV receiver Huh... I have heard of accidently flying the GPS course instead of the ILS, since transitioning from GPS to ILS is more common than the reverse, but I have never heard of the opposite. What scenario would allow this to easily occur? I cannot think of one, other than the pilot was seriously confused. Furthermore, the AP will not fly the glideslope unless APR (a separate AP mode button) was pushed. If someone *accidently* did this, then they would be best served voluntarily grounding themselves until they had remedial cockpit management training. Because its pitch information is based on rate of climb , mountain waves, buump clouds, thermals can cause significant airspeed and pitch chnage attitudes, including stalling the plane! True enough. A pilot flying with the KAP140 needs to be ready to adjust the throttle and disengage the AP at a moment's notice. Inadvertant engagement of the AP on teh ground can cause uncontrollable trim excursions There was a C182 accident somewhere in England a couple of years ago where this was the probable cause. The theory was that the pilot hit the AP button with his knuckle when he pushed the throttle forward for the runup, then never noticed the trim at full deflection. In response to the investigation, B/K made a few modifications to the AP to prevent this type of accident. I believe there was an A/D for the changes, but my KAP140 was produced after the changes were implemented (fall 2002), so I do not have the specifics on the A/D. One of the changes B/K made was the method in which a pilot engages the AP. No longer does the switch on the yoke engage the AP; it only disengages it. Additionally, the AP button on the AP itself must be held for three seconds to engage the unit. Another change was the addition of an audio warning ("Trim in Motion" over the intercom) if the trim is in motion for more than 4 seconds, presumably to call attention to the AP if it were inadvertently engaged on the ground. There is also an annunciator panel light that flashes when the trim is in motion for greater than four seconds. And finally, a non-AP change as a result of this accident was that Cessna was asked to change the order of the pre-takeoff checklist to move the "Trim set to TO" after the runup portion of the checklist. If this was done, it was done after the 2002 model year, as my checklist still has this item towards the beginning of pre-takeoff list. -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave,
You have confused me even more! If I am flying a radial with a cross wind, should the HDG bug be on the radial or should it be on the estimated course made good with the wind correction? Thanks, Ross "Dave Butler" wrote in message ... News wrote: snip What algorithm is the autopilot is using? How does it uses the Heading bug info in conjunction with the OBS and CDI? I noticed that once I am tracking a radial if I change the HDG bug the aircraft turns. My mental model has the autopilot just using the CDI deflection and OBS setting to hold a course, but obviously I am missing something. If anyone can point me to some more detailed information on how the AP uses the Heading Bug while in NAV or APR mode I would appreciate it. I don't have specific experience with the KAP140, but it sounds like it may work just like a couple of other ones I have used. I think you understand how it works in HDG mode, right? There is an error signal from the heading bug, and the aircraft is turned so as to correct the error. In NAV mode, the CDI error is (conceptually) added to the heading error, so that the effective zero-error heading will be slightly off the heading bug setting when the CDI is not centered. In a crosswind, theoretically the aircraft will track a course offset from the radial on the downwind side, with a heading offset into the wind. The CDI will be offset upwind, and the heading flown will be offset into the wind from the heading bug. In other words, it doesn't track the center of the radial, it tracks just enough off to the side so that the error signal from the CDI plus the error signal from the heading bug cancel each other. Dave Remove SHIRT to reply directly. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ross Magnaldo wrote:
If I am flying a radial with a cross wind, should the HDG bug be on the radial or should it be on the estimated course made good with the wind correction? When using NAV mode, the heading bug should precisely match the desired radial which is selected by the OBS. The airplane will then seek a heading which makes good the selected course, and that may not be heading selected by the bug if there is a crosswind. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Craig Prouse" wrote:
When using NAV mode, the heading bug should precisely match the desired radial which is selected by the OBS. The airplane will then seek a heading which makes good the selected course, and that may not be heading selected by the bug if there is a crosswind. The heading bug plays no part in NAV tracking on S-Tec 30 or 50 autopilots. Why is it necessary on tha KAP-140? -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dan Luke" wrote:
The heading bug plays no part in NAV tracking on S-Tec 30 or 50 autopilots. Why is it necessary on tha KAP-140? If I recall correctly, those S-Tec autopilots require the pilot to establish the aircraft on course before engaging the NAV course tracking mode. Once on course, the error signal from the CDI is probably sufficient to remain there. The KAP 140 has the capability to compute an automatic intercept heading and will take you to the desired radial or DTK then turn on course and track. You can be anywhere, pointing in the wrong direction altogether, with a full-scale deflection of the CDI, and the autopilot will turn you around and get you on course. This requires a reference heading for orientation. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Details on Wittman Buttercup | Charlie | Home Built | 1 | November 25th 03 04:19 AM |
Looking for a home for C130 autopilot amplifier... | tongaloa | Home Built | 0 | August 18th 03 06:44 PM |
Kinda OT but... Trying to flog a Sperry SP 20 autopilot servo ampfor C130... | tongaloa | Home Built | 0 | August 8th 03 07:45 PM |
Oshkosh Rec.Aviation Get-together details... | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 2 | August 3rd 03 04:31 PM |