A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

circumnavigating Chicago Class B



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old September 17th 04, 06:50 PM
Bob
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Travis Marlatte" wrote:

Most people transition the lakeshore at 2000. Personally, I do it at 2200 or
1800.


Is this option something you'd consider for a Cub or Champ
cruising at 70 mph with a battery operated radio and no
XPDR? If heading from the east coast (Mass) to Oshkosh in
such an old timer how would you go? I doubt I can get over
the top. Around the west side of Chicago or up through
Canada are pretty far at such a slow speed, and 50 miles
over water on the direct route is not something I'm anxious
to try.
  #12  
Old September 17th 04, 10:08 PM
john smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In 20+ years of going to OSH from OH, I have only gone over the top
once. All but one other time have been along the lakeshore. The other
exception was around the west side in 1985 in a Champ. That was to stop
for lunch and fuel at Clow.

Bob wrote:
"Travis Marlatte" wrote:


Most people transition the lakeshore at 2000. Personally, I do it at 2200 or
1800.



Is this option something you'd consider for a Cub or Champ
cruising at 70 mph with a battery operated radio and no
XPDR? If heading from the east coast (Mass) to Oshkosh in
such an old timer how would you go? I doubt I can get over
the top. Around the west side of Chicago or up through
Canada are pretty far at such a slow speed, and 50 miles
over water on the direct route is not something I'm anxious
to try.


  #13  
Old September 17th 04, 11:38 PM
Viperdoc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I have flown the low altitude route as well as over the top VFR and much
prefer the high altitude. If you have an engine problem you have a lot more
options, and traffic is a lot more visible up high.

Don't forget that all of the heavy iron has TCAS and will see you on the
screen well before you see them.


  #14  
Old September 18th 04, 01:56 PM
Travis Marlatte
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

No radio? No problem. No XPDR? Oops. You'd have to be pretty far out over
Lake Michigan to be outside the ORD class B 30nm mode C veil. So, that
depends on your definition of risk. Do you mind being 15 miles offshore with
no floats and a battery operated radio that might not transmit to shore and
no XPDR so that they could track your splash?

That's too much risk for me. I'd stick to the farm fields south and west of
the class B veil.

--
-------------------------------
Travis
"Bob" wrote in message
...
"Travis Marlatte" wrote:

Most people transition the lakeshore at 2000. Personally, I do it at 2200

or
1800.


Is this option something you'd consider for a Cub or Champ
cruising at 70 mph with a battery operated radio and no
XPDR? If heading from the east coast (Mass) to Oshkosh in
such an old timer how would you go? I doubt I can get over
the top. Around the west side of Chicago or up through
Canada are pretty far at such a slow speed, and 50 miles
over water on the direct route is not something I'm anxious
to try.



  #15  
Old September 18th 04, 02:47 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Travis Marlatte" wrote in message
ink.net...

No radio? No problem. No XPDR? Oops. You'd have to be pretty far out over
Lake Michigan to be outside the ORD class B 30nm mode C veil. So, that
depends on your definition of risk. Do you mind being 15 miles offshore
with
no floats and a battery operated radio that might not transmit to shore
and
no XPDR so that they could track your splash?

That's too much risk for me. I'd stick to the farm fields south and west
of
the class B veil.


Most Cubs and Champs were built without electrical systems and thus are
exempt from the transponder requirements of the Mode C veil.


  #16  
Old September 18th 04, 04:11 PM
john smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yep! I can fly right up to the inner-most cylinder, below 1200' AGL.

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
Most Cubs and Champs were built without electrical systems and thus are
exempt from the transponder requirements of the Mode C veil.


  #17  
Old September 18th 04, 06:14 PM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Travis Marlatte wrote:

No radio? No problem. No XPDR? Oops. You'd have to be pretty far out over
Lake Michigan to be outside the ORD class B 30nm mode C veil.


He said a Cub or a Champ; that is, an aircraft that was built with no electrical
system. He can fly such an aircraft within the veil as long as he stays out of the
class-B itself.

George Patterson
If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have
been looking for it.
  #18  
Old September 18th 04, 10:35 PM
Travis Marlatte
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Oops. Sorry. I guess I should have assumed that from the "battery operated
radio" phrase.

Then it's a phone call to get permission, right?

--
-------------------------------
Travis
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Travis Marlatte" wrote in message
ink.net...

No radio? No problem. No XPDR? Oops. You'd have to be pretty far out

over
Lake Michigan to be outside the ORD class B 30nm mode C veil. So, that
depends on your definition of risk. Do you mind being 15 miles offshore
with
no floats and a battery operated radio that might not transmit to shore
and
no XPDR so that they could track your splash?

That's too much risk for me. I'd stick to the farm fields south and west
of
the class B veil.


Most Cubs and Champs were built without electrical systems and thus are
exempt from the transponder requirements of the Mode C veil.




  #19  
Old September 18th 04, 10:48 PM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Travis Marlatte" wrote in message
ink.net...
Oops. Sorry. I guess I should have assumed that from the "battery operated
radio" phrase.

Then it's a phone call to get permission, right?


Only to operate within the Class B itself. Which is not what they are
suggesting.


  #20  
Old September 18th 04, 10:53 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Travis Marlatte" wrote in message
ink.net...

Oops. Sorry. I guess I should have assumed that from the "battery operated
radio" phrase.

Then it's a phone call to get permission, right?


No. No permission is required for VFR flight in the Mode C veil.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Negative XPDR - under the outer ring of Class C bcjames Piloting 8 August 30th 04 11:49 PM
Run-in with Chicago Center Jay Honeck Piloting 93 August 24th 04 04:53 PM
Overlapping class C & D Andrew Sarangan Piloting 14 May 6th 04 04:08 AM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 9th 04 11:35 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.