![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ryuzu wrote:
The Flying Instruction route is a common entry point however the research I did into this did throw up one point that's worth bearing in mind. In Australia you can get a HCPL with 105hrs, but need 400hrs to be able to instruct. Then the first thing to do is check to see if a US issued CFI license is transferrable or usable in AU. To get a HCPL over here, the min is only 40 hrs with 60 typical. In other words, if it is usable in AU, then come here for a month or two and get your license. I know that there are a lot of non-US students taking lessons at both flight schools that I frequent. As odd as it sounds, the US is rumored to be among the cheapest places to get a pilot license of any type. It may be worth his while to go this route. Heli lessons in an R22 average $200/hr. Dennis. Dennis Hawkins n4mwd AT amsat DOT org (humans know what to do) "A RECESSION is when you know somebody who is out of work. A DEPRESSION is when YOU are out of work. A RECOVERY is when all the H-1B's are out of work." To find out what an H-1B is and how they are putting Americans out of work, visit the following web site and click on the "Exporting America" CNN news video: http://zazona.com/ShameH1B/MediaClips.htm |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ken Sandyeggo" wrote in message
... From someone who's been around the block a few times, if you pick training and a profession based solely on what it pays, you're doomed to miserableness. If you don't love, or at least like a lot what you're doing, you may as well go straight to hell, do not pass "GO" and do not collect the $200. More pay is way less desireable than doing something you love to do. I finally got bored with my sign shop after almost 13 years, sold it and am now almost halfway through a course in nursing so I can work with kids, something I first thought of about 35 years ago. The next oldest student in my class is 18 years my junior and I'm 40 years older than the youngest one. Save working for starving wages, do what your heart tells you. Don't let anything stop you or anyone talk you out of it. There'll be struggles and hard times, but in the end, you'll be much richer than the guy that slugs it out at a job he hates for 40 years in order to get a pension......that may or may not be there when he expects it. Just had an ex-sister-in-law that stayed devoted to ATT in Chicago for over 22 years, commuting over 90 miles per day via car and train one-way to get there. She would have been eligible for her pension in a couple of years and was looking forward to it. "Sorry, we're closing the department. Here's a couple months pay and good luck in your job hunt." (Sound of door slamming behind her). She gets diddly, because the pension "benefit" was completely company funded, so she had no vested interest in it at all. That sounds good when you're first hired; a free pension. Her pension was worth exactly what she put into it....zilch. Ken J. - Sandy Eggo Thanks for that, it pretty much sums up the way I feel. However, I'm not looking into the money in order to make the decision, I'm looking into the practicalities of a decision I've just about made. Unfortunately the amount of money I unexpectedly came across is just barely enough to do the course, so it won't pay for many extra hours above the licence itself. So I'll end up spending $40K and have 105 hours clocked up. If I can't then get some extra hours up at someone else's expense, my current job certainly won't provide for them with a wife, kids, mortgage, and car loan to feed. I need to be practical about it, cause the other course of action with $40k would mean, NO car loan, HALF the mortgage, and a wife who would then be able to quit her job and work part time - which has been her dream for a long time. Her dream, or mine? As much as I like doing things for ME, I love doing things for her, and so if I can't increase my income from this dream, then I'd rather help her meet her dream. Besides, I'm over 38, I'd be 39 by the time I finished the course, that means trying to find work at 40, with only 105 hours clocked up. I don't see that happening. I would think, that 105 hours and then basically NONE, might actually hurt far more than never having flown. Oh well, it's given me food for thought, 45 hours less time to get the licence, means 45 more lots of $350 in my pocket, which means more than enough to go to the US, do the licence, come back, and also spend a nice chunk on the Missus, but I'd need to look into the requirements once I get back here, regarding changing the licence over. Trentus |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... ryuzu wrote: The Flying Instruction route is a common entry point however the research I did into this did throw up one point that's worth bearing in mind. In Australia you can get a HCPL with 105hrs, but need 400hrs to be able to instruct. Then the first thing to do is check to see if a US issued CFI license is transferrable or usable in AU. To get a HCPL over here, the min is only 40 hrs with 60 typical. In other words, if it is usable in AU, then come here for a month or two and get your license. I know that there are a lot of non-US students taking lessons at both flight schools that I frequent. As odd as it sounds, the US is rumored to be among the cheapest places to get a pilot license of any type. It may be worth his while to go this route. Heli lessons in an R22 average $200/hr. $350 an hour here, but then with our dollar only worth 69cents over there, that ends up about the same amount, and I'd have to pay for the airfare and accomodation to get there. But then, at 105 hours here (125 hours if the final 30 hours are completed in a time 3 months) versus your 60 hours, those 45 extra multiples of $350 would easily pay the costs of travel/accomodation. But what will I be up for upon return? And it's going to be hard enough to do anything with the licence with 105 hours clocked up, 60 hours sure aint going to get me much paid work here. Trentus |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Trentus" wrote:
If I can't then get some extra hours up at someone else's expense, my current job certainly won't provide for them with a wife, kids, mortgage, and car loan to feed. I need to be practical about it, cause the other course of action with $40k would mean, NO car loan, HALF the mortgage, and a wife who would then be able to quit her job and work part time - which has Be cautious when partially paying off a mortgage. I have seen some here that consider extra payments as payments toward interest and not principal. I suggest that you refinance at a lower principal rather than try to deal with the current mortgage. To be honest, although I love helicopters, if I were in your shoes, practicality would make me choose this option. Oh well, it's given me food for thought, 45 hours less time to get the licence, means 45 more lots of $350 in my pocket, which means more than enough to go to the US, do the licence, come back, and also spend a nice chunk on the Missus, but I'd need to look into the requirements once I get back here, regarding changing the licence over. The time to look into the transferability is before you come over here. I don't know anything about AU law to help you on that. Nevertheless, even at a 69 cent conversion, those AU $350 hours are costing you over US $240. If you get 2 hours a day, that US $80 daily savings would more than take care of your loging expenses. Also, some of the heli schools have contracted lodging which brings the cost down even more. So, like you said, with air fare and lodging, the hourly cost would be about the same, however, its the total number of hours required. Also, the FAA has approved certain flight simulators that some schools have for credit toward your license. Up to 7 hours I think. The dual sim hours are only about $100. Just remember, a paycheck in the hand is worth two in the bush. Dennis. Dennis Hawkins n4mwd AT amsat DOT org (humans know what to do) "A RECESSION is when you know somebody who is out of work. A DEPRESSION is when YOU are out of work. A RECOVERY is when all the H-1B's are out of work." To find out what an H-1B is and how they are putting Americans out of work, visit the following web site and click on the "Exporting America" CNN news video: http://zazona.com/ShameH1B/MediaClips.htm |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I thought I'd post a little more of my research into Aus vs US for
helo training. I'm not a HPPL or CPL or anything, this is just the research I've done to reach my decision. It may well be incorrect, and if some kind soul corrects this then thanks to them. So a HCPL package looks cheaper in Australia vs US - i.e. it's cheaper to get the CPL certificate in AUS, but looking beneath that there are a couple of important facts relating to hours. Ultimately sufficient hours are what will get you your first and subsequent flying jobs and without sufficient hours a job will be next to impossible regardless pof having a CPL certificate. The most efficient way into a paid job is through flying instruction. I guess there are some who have managed to jump into some non-instruction work but increasingly that seems almost impossible due to insurance problems for low hour pilots. In the US a PPL/CPL/CFI will take 150hrs (I know another posted mentioned 60hrs - I'm not certain what they were referring to for 60hrs, presumably the flat CPL). At 150hrs in the US you can instruct, although realistically you'll probably need 200hrs (certainly for R22 instructing) as a minimum. In Aus though, you can get a CPL with just 105hrs, but you can't instruct until you reach 400hrs. So you see, the paper is cheaper in Aus (less hours to CPL) but the route to a job is longer (400hrs) and therefore more expensive than the US. So far then the US is looking good. But then the fun begins. Your US CFI is of course no use to you in Australia with just 150hrs, so you have to make up the difference somehow. You could just hour build in Aus, or the US, or you could instruct in the US. In here is possible option 1 although it's a long shot. Getting back from the US with your FAA stuff, you do the Aus conversions. Then you've got around 150hr Aus CPL. This ight put you in a better position to get a job in Australia than a 105hr CPL. But I think either is a long shot to be fair. Staying in the US to do someinstructing (and build hours) is option 2. US instructing doesn't command very large pay - somewhere between US$10 and US$20 per FLYING hour. Let's say you manage 14 flying hours a week on average, your pay would be US$140 to US$280 a week (around US$600 to US$1000 per month). However the final probelm is that to instruct in the US, you need a suitable Visa and in total probably 1.5 to years over there (9 months for the training and the rest of the time to work). The training VISA is easy to get, the working part less so but doable. Having gone the US route, you'll need to convert your licenses to the Aus equivalents before working/instructing - that'll be at least some written exams and probably a flight test too - not that much money in the scheme of things but by then you'll have pretty much blown whatever initial investment you had. Now for a single guy or even a childless couple with a small capital sum the whole thing is feasible...for someone with children, later in life with a pretty settled view of the world, crossing into Helo flying is going to take not just a big commitment of cash, but also personal time and significant upheaval. It's this latter part that will be the clincher - for example, are you ready for your family to be out in the US for 2 years with a low income etc. Things like the house and car will probably have to be sold too - you might get by without the money from them, but the US won't give you a VISA unless you can prove you can pay the course fees AND live (the whole family btw) without any kind of income for the whole period you're out there. The final point I can make is that even after you get to say the 500 to 1000hr mark - it's still tricky. Most of my research suggests that those early years (perhaps 5 or so if things go well) are going to be pretty nomadic if you're going to get anywhere. I saw someone describe helo work as living where the dirt trail ends because that's where helo's are most useful. Not all that conducive to family life (assuming the family even agree to come with you!). So there you go, my studying of the subject all shows it to be tricky, not for the faint hearted and if things go well you're looking at 5 years of relative hardship if you're enjoying a fairly comfortable life now. If after weighing everything up you still go for it, then best of luck. r. Thanks for that, it pretty much sums up the way I feel. However, I'm not looking into the money in order to make the decision, I'm looking into the practicalities of a decision I've just about made. Unfortunately the amount of money I unexpectedly came across is just barely enough to do the course, so it won't pay for many extra hours above the licence itself. So I'll end up spending $40K and have 105 hours clocked up. If I can't then get some extra hours up at someone else's expense, my current job certainly won't provide for them with a wife, kids, mortgage, and car loan to feed. I need to be practical about it, cause the other course of action with $40k would mean, NO car loan, HALF the mortgage, and a wife who would then be able to quit her job and work part time - which has been her dream for a long time. Her dream, or mine? As much as I like doing things for ME, I love doing things for her, and so if I can't increase my income from this dream, then I'd rather help her meet her dream. Besides, I'm over 38, I'd be 39 by the time I finished the course, that means trying to find work at 40, with only 105 hours clocked up. I don't see that happening. I would think, that 105 hours and then basically NONE, might actually hurt far more than never having flown. Oh well, it's given me food for thought, 45 hours less time to get the licence, means 45 more lots of $350 in my pocket, which means more than enough to go to the US, do the licence, come back, and also spend a nice chunk on the Missus, but I'd need to look into the requirements once I get back here, regarding changing the licence over. Trentus |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(ryuzu) wrote:
In the US a PPL/CPL/CFI will take 150hrs (I know another posted mentioned 60hrs - I'm not certain what they were referring to for 60hrs, presumably the flat CPL). At 150hrs in the US you can instruct, although realistically you'll probably need 200hrs (certainly for R22 instructing) as a minimum. Hi Sherri, I was the one who said that. You only need a min of 40 hours to get your HPPL with the average being 60. If I said HCPL, it was a typo. Dennis. Dennis Hawkins n4mwd AT amsat DOT org (humans know what to do) "A RECESSION is when you know somebody who is out of work. A DEPRESSION is when YOU are out of work. A RECOVERY is when all the H-1B's are out of work." To find out what an H-1B is and how they are putting Americans out of work, visit the following web site and click on the "Exporting America" CNN news video: http://zazona.com/ShameH1B/MediaClips.htm |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Trentus" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... ryuzu wrote: The Flying Instruction route is a common entry point however the research I did into this did throw up one point that's worth bearing in mind. In Australia you can get a HCPL with 105hrs, but need 400hrs to be able to instruct. Then the first thing to do is check to see if a US issued CFI license is transferrable or usable in AU. To get a HCPL over here, the min is only 40 hrs with 60 typical. In other words, if it is usable in AU, then come here for a month or two and get your license. I know that there are a lot of non-US students taking lessons at both flight schools that I frequent. As odd as it sounds, the US is rumored to be among the cheapest places to get a pilot license of any type. It may be worth his while to go this route. Heli lessons in an R22 average $200/hr. $350 an hour here, but then with our dollar only worth 69cents over there, that ends up about the same amount, and I'd have to pay for the airfare and accomodation to get there. But then, at 105 hours here (125 hours if the final 30 hours are completed in a time 3 months) versus your 60 hours, those 45 extra multiples of $350 would easily pay the costs of travel/accomodation. But what will I be up for upon return? And it's going to be hard enough to do anything with the licence with 105 hours clocked up, 60 hours sure aint going to get me much paid work here. Trentus As I have a passion for helicopters, I keep track of this newsgroup, but though I was fortunate enough to be sponsored by the RAF to gain my fixed wing PPL about 16 years ago, I have never been able to fulfil my dream of flying rotary wing. Indeed, finances and job commitments are such that I have had to let even my fixed wing PPL go by the board. :-( It's nowhere near the same as "real" flying, but the way I indulge my aforementioned passion now is by flying R/C helicopters. Like I say, nowhere near the same as the real thing, but a good "second best". A lot cheaper also... Even so, I still intend to have at least an hour or two of flying lessons in a heli, just so I don't go to my grave wondering what it would have been like to have a go. Tim --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.525 / Virus Database: 322 - Release Date: 09/10/2003 |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah that's what I thought but the whole thing has so many options I didn't
wnat to second guess it was HPPL only... Thanks for the update! r. Hi Sherri, I was the one who said that. You only need a min of 40 hours to get your HPPL with the average being 60. If I said HCPL, it was a typo. Dennis. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ChopperJon2 wrote: I would'nt fly a helicopter in Australia if i was you. They do not keep track of hours in use, which determines a maintenance schedule. Come to the usa Pompano Helicopters I beg your pardon! And don't just quote one accident report from station properties. Whats your reasons for the statement? r |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Do You Want to Become a Commercial Helicopter Pilot? | Badwater Bill | Rotorcraft | 7 | August 22nd 04 12:00 AM |
Self fly hire in the US | Nigel | Piloting | 25 | March 28th 04 09:20 AM |
Musings of a Commercial Helicopter Pilot | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 6 | February 27th 04 09:11 AM |
Small Sheriff's Departments Using Helicopters | Gig Giacona | Rotorcraft | 23 | September 7th 03 09:52 AM |