![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Trent Moorehead" wrote in message ... "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... "Rich S." wrote in message ... [...] Gas that is not blended for altitude and or season (temperature) can make the fan stop turning. In your car, you likely bought gas that was intended for use at Lake Tahoe and/or in temps over 100° F. That's silly. We have driven a Suburban, with its 42 gallon tank, all over the US, including Lake Tahoe. We bought the fuel we rode into Tahoe on at least 500 miles away, not far above sea level, in the desert. Many times, fuel purchased in one locale took us right into a place with completely different characteristics (altitude, temperature, whatever). Formulations aside, my big concern with buying mogas from a podunk airport tank is that the gas could be old and contaminated. This would be due to the small number of planes that are actually set up to burn mogas. With 100LL, you can feel a bit more assured that the fuel has a had a decent "turnover" rate and the fuel is fresher and cleaner. -Trent PP-ASEL More engines are mogas capable than those that need 100LL. If 100LL were to disappear the vast majority of the fleet would get along just fine on mogas. In fact the majority of the fleet is much better off burning mogas. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The ONLY time I've EVER had engine trouble has been while operating with
100 LL -- which has far more lead in it than my engine was designed to run on. Just how much do you think "too much" is? 80 octane avgas -- which my engine was designed to use -- had roughly 25% (?) of the lead 100 "low lead" (ha!) has in it today. Which explains why I have to mercilessly lean my engine when running 100LL avgas to prevent spark plug fouling. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Morgans" wrote in message news ![]() "Blueskies" wrote Ok, fuel is 6 lbs/gallon, and the quote says there is 6 lbs of lead in a gallon...what???? Ahh, grasshopper, read it very carefully, again. There is great truth in the details, and relationships of the part, and the whole. g -- Jim (wise teacher) in NC Extremely poorly worded sentence. It has multiple meanings. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Blueskies" wrote in message ... "Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... April 27, 2002 Pelican's Perch #55: Lead in the Hogwash When 100/130 was the standard, the mix limit was four grams of lead per gallon, but in reality the actual blends were around 2.7, for the same reasons. (There are about 6.0 pounds, or about 2,721 grams in a gallon of 100LL, so the lead is less than 0.0735%, by weight.)" http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/182149-1.html Ok, fuel is 6 lbs/gallon, and the quote says there is 6 lbs of lead in a gallon...what???? 100/130 is four grams of lead per gallon (actually 2.7) and there are 2721 grams in a gallon. Read it again and this time pause at the "(". :~) |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Blueskies" wrote in message ... "Morgans" wrote in message news ![]() "Blueskies" wrote Ok, fuel is 6 lbs/gallon, and the quote says there is 6 lbs of lead in a gallon...what???? Ahh, grasshopper, read it very carefully, again. There is great truth in the details, and relationships of the part, and the whole. g -- Jim (wise teacher) in NC Ok, I suppose it can be read that way also... "When 100/130 was the standard, the mix limit was four grams of lead per gallon, but in reality the actual blends were around 2.7, for the same reasons. (There are about 6.0 pounds, or about 2,721 grams in a gallon of 100LL, so the lead is less than 0.0735%, by weight.)" I don't think I have never heard of weight being 'in' something, a better read would be something like a gallon weighs 6 lbs, or about 2,721 grams, so... (Sigh) Dan (with 185 pounds in him) D. ;-) Would an English Lit teacher be able to break down the lead content ratios? :~) |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Stadt" wrote in message ... More engines are mogas capable than those that need 100LL. If 100LL were to disappear the vast majority of the fleet would get along just fine on mogas. In fact the majority of the fleet is much better off burning mogas. You probably already know, but that 25% that needs 100LL is the bunch that flies 75% (or so) of the hours each year. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Stadt" wrote in message ... "Morgans" wrote in message news ![]() "Blueskies" wrote Ok, fuel is 6 lbs/gallon, and the quote says there is 6 lbs of lead in a gallon...what???? Ahh, grasshopper, read it very carefully, again. There is great truth in the details, and relationships of the part, and the whole. g -- Jim (wise teacher) in NC Extremely poorly worded sentence. It has multiple meanings. Only when taken out of context of the previous sentence |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... "Dave Stadt" wrote in message ... More engines are mogas capable than those that need 100LL. If 100LL were to disappear the vast majority of the fleet would get along just fine on mogas. In fact the majority of the fleet is much better off burning mogas. You probably already know, but that 25% that needs 100LL is the bunch that flies 75% (or so) of the hours each year. I would need to see something to support that. The 100LLers are the high performance engines which in my experience sit in the hangar. Given, on those few occasions when they do venture out they burn a lot of gas. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Blueskies" wrote I don't think I have never heard of weight being 'in' something, a better read would be something like a gallon weighs 6 lbs, or about 2,721 grams, so... Dan (with 185 pounds in him) D. ;-) No doubt, it could have been written more clearly. -- Jim in NC |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would need to see something to support that. The 100LLers are the high
performance engines which in my experience sit in the hangar. Agreed -- although offsetting that are the air charters that fly many hours on end. I believe they are skewing the numbers dramatically. At my field, private twins and truly high performance birds rarely leave their hangars. What we see flying all day long, day in and day out, are the C-150s and Cherokee 140s -- both of which could be (and possibly already are) running on mogas. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MOGAS availability database | [email protected] | Home Built | 54 | May 9th 05 12:02 AM |
Problem with Lowrance Database Update? | Stuart Grant | Piloting | 5 | December 24th 04 03:16 AM |
Simulation Resources Database | Tom Allensworth | Simulators | 2 | September 27th 04 01:02 AM |
Database update for Foster LRN-500 loran? | Ray Andraka | Owning | 4 | September 3rd 03 06:08 PM |
Garmin 90 Database Updates Discontinued | Val Christian | Piloting | 14 | August 20th 03 09:32 PM |