![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I need some opinions on this possible scenario
Here is my situation.... I have a full time day job making good money, which I am not wanting to leaving. I am a private pilot with 143.8 total hours (94.1 PIC) and I am wanting to teach the PPSEL rating as a CFI for additional income. My thinking is I would not have enough time or funds to maintain IFR currency and have no desire to teach the IFR rating. I also have no desire of making flying my sole employement or income resources (wife, baby, mortgage, etc.) So based on that I am thinking about skipping the IR rating and going straight to the commerical and then CFI. I know this probably isn't that common, but is there anything wrong with my thinking or going this route? Would I be looked upon differently if I decided to go this route? All opinions welcome Thanks |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The commerical is a great idea. However, you must hold an instrument
rating in order to apply CFI-airplane. I'm not sure why since most CFIs (and even most CFIIs) are not current or capable of going in the clouds. -Robert |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in news:1116470871.680560.327430
@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com: The commerical is a great idea. However, you must hold an instrument rating in order to apply CFI-airplane. I'm not sure why since most CFIs (and even most CFIIs) are not current or capable of going in the clouds. -Robert I don't know if 'most' is an accurate description, but certainly 'many' CFIs are not instrument current. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
before the Instrument rating was mandatory for CFI...
IIRC... a CFI without an instrument rating could not take his student more than 50nm from home.. made it sort of difficult to instruct cross country BT "Bill Zaleski" wrote in message ... An new airplane CFI must hold an instrument rating. FAR 61.183 (c) (2) On 18 May 2005 19:12:31 -0700, wrote: I need some opinions on this possible scenario Here is my situation.... I have a full time day job making good money, which I am not wanting to leaving. I am a private pilot with 143.8 total hours (94.1 PIC) and I am wanting to teach the PPSEL rating as a CFI for additional income. My thinking is I would not have enough time or funds to maintain IFR currency and have no desire to teach the IFR rating. I also have no desire of making flying my sole employement or income resources (wife, baby, mortgage, etc.) So based on that I am thinking about skipping the IR rating and going straight to the commerical and then CFI. I know this probably isn't that common, but is there anything wrong with my thinking or going this route? Would I be looked upon differently if I decided to go this route? All opinions welcome Thanks |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert M. Gary wrote:
The commerical is a great idea. However, you must hold an instrument rating in order to apply CFI-airplane. I'm not sure why since most CFIs (and even most CFIIs) are not current or capable of going in the clouds. If he's smart he'll take the instrument written and the commercial written as close together as possible. There's a fair amount of overlap on the regs. When did most CFIs lose their currency? I've been away for a good while but it seemed like most of the CFIs I used to know were quite capable. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN VE |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks,
I guess that takes care of that question. Now for another one. Instrument or Commercial rating first? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I guess that takes care of that question.
Now for another one. Instrument or Commercial rating first? Depends. Time was I would say go for the IR first, but nowadays there are so many sexy gizmos in the cockpit that new pilots spend far too much time looking at them and not enough time looking out the window. And enjoying the actual flight, for that matter. Without a purple line, some of them may have difficulty knowing where they are on a paper chart. Training for the IR just teaches more looking at instruments rather than out the window. If you are already spending too much eye-down time, then go for the commercial rating first. The training for the commercial rating involves doing the same stuff as a private pilot, only with greater precision and control (evidenced in part by a set of required maneuvers). It's pretty much all look-out-the-window and feel-of-the-stick flying, which is a great antidote to GPS syndrome. So, examine your own flying, see which camp you fit into, and decide appropriately. Jose -- Money: what you need when you run out of brains. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BTIZ wrote:
before the Instrument rating was mandatory for CFI... IIRC... a CFI without an instrument rating could not take his student more than 50nm from home.. made it sort of difficult to instruct cross country If you re-position enough times, you can call just about anything a XC! (Just kidding, couldn't resist, see previous thread on this) OT: I just realized that being a Dad is like being a CFI. You help guide the 'student' to make the correct decisions and let them experience just enough without hurting themselves. ![]() Hilton |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aw Rating merger and Today's ASW | Charlie Wolf | Naval Aviation | 5 | May 12th 05 10:34 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
How Many Hours Did You Complete Your Commercial rating in? | Cecil E. Chapman | Piloting | 16 | January 2nd 04 03:47 AM |
rotorcraft commercial rating or better rating advice | Rick Cook | Rotorcraft | 0 | October 13th 03 04:49 PM |
Enlisted pilots | John Randolph | Naval Aviation | 41 | July 21st 03 02:11 PM |