![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Teacherjh wrote:
KPHL, On departure, there is no conveinent place to do a runup (once you're in the taxiway system), so ask first where to do it so you don't block traffic. I didn't know this and expected to do a runup at the departure end of the runway. Well, it was tight, and a few bizjets squeaked by while I was doing it; this was clearly not the preferred method. Good point! I forgot about that. I did the same thing. Dave Remove SHIRT to reply directly. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
EDR wrote:
PHL has a website (www.phl.org). Look at the Flight Information tab. I am amazed to see that aircarrier operations don't really commence operations until 1030 ET! With the exception of one flight at 0630, it looks like you can get in or out without delay. Excellent -- I didn't know about that site. In my (still fairly limited) flying experience, it takes a *lot* of jet traffic to start causing delays for us little guys (i.e. more than one landing every 4-5 minutes). So far, I've had no trouble getting in and out of Montreal/Dorval VFR and IFR. I did get looped on my last IFR approach at my home airport (Ottawa/Macdonald-Cartier), but only because the SID put me on the localizer more than 20 miles back and then ATC couldn't figure out what to do with the faster traffic behind me; since I had already broken into VMC, I just cancelled IFR and entered the VFR circuit for the north field, so there was no real delay even then. All the best, David |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Teacherjh wrote:
KPHL, On departure, there is no conveinent place to do a runup (once you're in the taxiway system), so ask first where to do it so you don't block traffic. I didn't know this and expected to do a runup at the departure end of the runway. Well, it was tight, and a few bizjets squeaked by while I was doing it; this was clearly not the preferred method. Yes, I try to do the run-up well before getting to the runway when at large airports. Having said that, it is your prerogative to do it there, but you tend to annoy a number of people that way. Often, if you are taxing out and have at least one airplane in front of you, you'll have plenty of time for your run-up while the other airplane is entering the runway for take-off or just while waiting in line. However, if I have to wait long on the ramp for my clearance, I'll do the run-up before taxi as long as my engine is warmed up a little. Matt |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
ogers.com, David Megginson wrote: EDR wrote: PHL has a website (www.phl.org). Look at the Flight Information tab. I am amazed to see that aircarrier operations don't really commence operations until 1030 ET! With the exception of one flight at 0630, it looks like you can get in or out without delay. Excellent -- I didn't know about that site. In my (still fairly limited) flying experience, it takes a *lot* of jet traffic to start causing delays for us little guys (i.e. more than one landing every 4-5 minutes). So far, I've had no trouble getting in and out of Montreal/Dorval VFR and IFR. I did get looped on my last IFR approach at my home airport (Ottawa/Macdonald-Cartier), but only because the SID put me on the localizer more than 20 miles back and then ATC couldn't figure out what to do with the faster traffic behind me; since I had already broken into VMC, I just cancelled IFR and entered the VFR circuit for the north field, so there was no real delay even then. I learned many years ago, that when flying into an aircarrier hub airport, always check their arrival/dparture schedules and plan your arrival/departure time for the mid-morning and mid-afternoon gaps. Sure beats being number xx in line for departure. Another trick at these airports is to request and intersection departure. This will sometimes get you out ahead of the que. Watch where the departing aircraft lifts off and be carefull to avoid wake turbulence with spacing and turns. Advise ATC of your intended actions prior to taking the active and they will try to accommodate you with a turn away from the traffic. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, EDR said:
beats being number xx in line for departure. Another trick at these airports is to request and intersection departure. This will sometimes get you out ahead of the que. Watch where the departing aircraft lifts One time I asked for an intersection departure, and they told me that if I wanted one, I'd have to wait the full wake turbulence time, but if I went to the end I could get out immediately. I still don't understand that one. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ Just another organic pain collector racing to oblivion |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() One time I asked for an intersection departure, and they told me that if I wanted one, I'd have to wait the full wake turbulence time, but if I went to the end I could get out immediately. I still don't understand that one. Depending on where the intersection was, you might be significantly closer to the rotation point, leaving fewer options for turning in time to avoid the rotor. Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Paul Tomblin
wrote: In a previous article, EDR said: beats being number xx in line for departure. Another trick at these airports is to request and intersection departure. This will sometimes get you out ahead of the que. Watch where the departing aircraft lifts One time I asked for an intersection departure, and they told me that if I wanted one, I'd have to wait the full wake turbulence time, but if I went to the end I could get out immediately. I still don't understand that one. The way around that is to do as you do with formation takeoffs, tell the tower "Pilot assumes all responsibility." Once their ass is covered, they will usually give you what you want. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One time I asked for an intersection departure, and they told me that if I
wanted one, I'd have to wait the full wake turbulence time, but if I went to the end I could get out immediately. I still don't understand that one. The way around that is to do as you do with formation takeoffs, tell the tower "Pilot assumes all responsibility." Once their ass is covered, they will usually give you what you want. Not in this case. Check the AIM, paragraph 7-3-9. The three minute wait for departure from an intersection cannot be waived when the preceding aircraft is a heavy or a 757: http://www1.faa.gov/atpubs/aim/Chap7/aim0703.html#7-3-9 |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Megginson writes:
I'll be flying from Ottawa to Philadelphia next weekend for a week-long conference, and would be grateful for hints and information from people familiar with the U.S. portion of the route. I wouldn't worry too much about what route you file, it will most probably change -- several times during your flight. Is that not the case in Canada? I've never landed at PHL, but I did my instruments at PNE, which is under Philadelphia approach. It has been my experience that PHL approach think they are the most overworked controllers in the universe, even though they handle significantly less traffic than, say, the neighboring NY approach. Maybe they just don't have enough patience for training flights. (I've never flown in their airspace in actual; I moved away the day after I passed my instrument checkride). Enjoy XML 2003. Are you giving a talk? Ari. -- Elections only count as free and trials as fair if you can lose money betting on the outcome. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|