![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thought I'd better share this as others might be flying approaches
using the newest Jepp database for the Northstar M3 Approach GPS. I downloaded the newest Northern Hemisphere database using Skybound USB just prior to going for an Instrument Proficiency Check. The examiner had me fly the GPS-B approach into KMMV using BERNI as the IAF. I selected and ACK'd the approach to fly direct BERNI and flew the indicated heading. When the GPS said I'd arrived at BERNI, I turned to enter the hold and the examiner asked me to look outside. I was right over the airport! BERNI is five miles Southwest of the airport! I checked BERNI as an intersection as opposed to its position in the approach and it indicated at its correct distance and bearing. Flipped back to the approach and confirmed that it repeated the behavior after resetting the unit - it did. We then decided to fly the NBG(GPS) RWY22 approach using MINNE as the IAF. Went to dial it into the database and it didn't exist. The only IAFs listed were AAA, ABBMY and ABB#2, none of which exist. I ended up flying the VOR for my non-precision approach and everything else was anticlimactic. When we got back, I pulled out last month's database card and put it in the GPS. Everything was fine on it. I don't know how widespread the problem is, but I suspect that if two out of two approaches I sampled were bad, it might be ubiquitous. If so, someone could end up flying into a mountain five miles from the runway they think they're about to touch down on. I notified Jeppesen and they are aware of the problem. Apparently CMC Electronics, who currently own the Northstar GPS software, are involved in the issue and are currently researching it. BE CAREFUL! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I saw a similar issue last year with my approach certified Garmin.
According to the data card, one of our local airports was over 50 miles from its actual location. Garmin blamed Jeppesen, and Jeppesen blamed Garmin. Moral: verify your data. Computers (GPS) are as smart as the data they are given. Rip Cheetah236 wrote: Thought I'd better share this as others might be flying approaches using the newest Jepp database for the Northstar M3 Approach GPS. I downloaded the newest Northern Hemisphere database using Skybound USB just prior to going for an Instrument Proficiency Check. The examiner had me fly the GPS-B approach into KMMV using BERNI as the IAF. I selected and ACK'd the approach to fly direct BERNI and flew the indicated heading. When the GPS said I'd arrived at BERNI, I turned to enter the hold and the examiner asked me to look outside. I was right over the airport! BERNI is five miles Southwest of the airport! I checked BERNI as an intersection as opposed to its position in the approach and it indicated at its correct distance and bearing. Flipped back to the approach and confirmed that it repeated the behavior after resetting the unit - it did. We then decided to fly the NBG(GPS) RWY22 approach using MINNE as the IAF. Went to dial it into the database and it didn't exist. The only IAFs listed were AAA, ABBMY and ABB#2, none of which exist. I ended up flying the VOR for my non-precision approach and everything else was anticlimactic. When we got back, I pulled out last month's database card and put it in the GPS. Everything was fine on it. I don't know how widespread the problem is, but I suspect that if two out of two approaches I sampled were bad, it might be ubiquitous. If so, someone could end up flying into a mountain five miles from the runway they think they're about to touch down on. I notified Jeppesen and they are aware of the problem. Apparently CMC Electronics, who currently own the Northstar GPS software, are involved in the issue and are currently researching it. BE CAREFUL! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We ran into the same thing the other day with our M3. Exact same behavior,
but at KHSV and KMDQ. Then we redownloaded the database and programmed our spare datacard, same behavior. Then we tried to restore the old database, at least it would be good for VFR. But that cannot be done, Jeppesen says it is obsolete and expired and they will not allow it to be reprogrammed. "Cheetah236" wrote in message oups.com... Thought I'd better share this as others might be flying approaches using the newest Jepp database for the Northstar M3 Approach GPS. I downloaded the newest Northern Hemisphere database using Skybound USB just prior to going for an Instrument Proficiency Check. The examiner had me fly the GPS-B approach into KMMV using BERNI as the IAF. I selected and ACK'd the approach to fly direct BERNI and flew the indicated heading. When the GPS said I'd arrived at BERNI, I turned to enter the hold and the examiner asked me to look outside. I was right over the airport! BERNI is five miles Southwest of the airport! I checked BERNI as an intersection as opposed to its position in the approach and it indicated at its correct distance and bearing. Flipped back to the approach and confirmed that it repeated the behavior after resetting the unit - it did. We then decided to fly the NBG(GPS) RWY22 approach using MINNE as the IAF. Went to dial it into the database and it didn't exist. The only IAFs listed were AAA, ABBMY and ABB#2, none of which exist. I ended up flying the VOR for my non-precision approach and everything else was anticlimactic. When we got back, I pulled out last month's database card and put it in the GPS. Everything was fine on it. I don't know how widespread the problem is, but I suspect that if two out of two approaches I sampled were bad, it might be ubiquitous. If so, someone could end up flying into a mountain five miles from the runway they think they're about to touch down on. I notified Jeppesen and they are aware of the problem. Apparently CMC Electronics, who currently own the Northstar GPS software, are involved in the issue and are currently researching it. BE CAREFUL! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you rely on GPS in IMC you need TWO GPS's (or backup your location
with VOR/DME). And it is best if they are of different manufacturers. A handheld to backup the panel mount is sufficient. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Two different GPS's from two different manufacturers?? That would also mean
two different navdata subscriptions too. Your second suggestion of VOR/DME backup is OK but on pure GPS approaches that wouldn't work. Probably the most practical thing to do is your third recommendation to have a portable GPS running to verify your position. In the original poster's case, he would have noticed that he was approaching the airport immediately realizing that something was wrong. It's another reason to get the Garmin 396 or even the 296 with terrain. Marco Leon "Doug" wrote in message oups.com... If you rely on GPS in IMC you need TWO GPS's (or backup your location with VOR/DME). And it is best if they are of different manufacturers. A handheld to backup the panel mount is sufficient. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well a handheld IS a GPS. Two different GPS', like one panel mount and
a handheld. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Doug" wrote in news:1126227944.916583.168690
@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com: If you rely on GPS in IMC you need TWO GPS's (or backup your location with VOR/DME). And it is best if they are of different manufacturers. A handheld to backup the panel mount is sufficient. I don't agree. We regularly fly in IMC using one GPS, and it's approved under Part 135. We do have 2 VORs installed, but they're worthless a couple of hundred miles from the nearest transmitter. Before GPS, we flew approaches using a single LORAN. -- Regards, Stan "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." B. Franklin |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Marco Leon wrote:
It's another reason to get the Garmin 396 or even the 296 with terrain. For navigation and situational awarenes there is no difference between a 296 and 396. If a person wants to keep the 296/396 database current they should buy the annual subscriptions to both the Jeppesen and obstacle databases. Perhaps this seems pricy to renters but it shouldn't be for an owner, less he/she is underfunded. ;-) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stan Gosnell wrote:
"Doug" wrote in news:1126227944.916583.168690 @z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com: If you rely on GPS in IMC you need TWO GPS's (or backup your location with VOR/DME). And it is best if they are of different manufacturers. A handheld to backup the panel mount is sufficient. I don't agree. We regularly fly in IMC using one GPS, and it's approved under Part 135. We do have 2 VORs installed, but they're worthless a couple of hundred miles from the nearest transmitter. Before GPS, we flew approaches using a single LORAN. It's like vanilla and chocolate, a matter of personal preference and comfort level. In your situation you are a professional flying to familiar locations again and again, so you have a lot of built-in situational awareness that folks who go to unfamiliar places do not have. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cheetah236 wrote:
Thought I'd better share this as others might be flying approaches using the newest Jepp database for the Northstar M3 Approach GPS. Jeppesen just posted a bulletin on their web site about this issue. Scary, isn't it. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Polars web page | Paul Remde | Soaring | 0 | August 6th 05 03:10 PM |
JPI Data Format and Conversion | Josh | Products | 4 | June 13th 05 04:20 AM |
[ICSEng'05] Final CFP - due date March 10, 2005 | Utthaman | Naval Aviation | 0 | March 5th 05 09:07 AM |
Pirep: Garmin GPSMAP 296 versus 295. (very long) | Jon Woellhaf | Piloting | 12 | September 4th 04 11:55 PM |