![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() 1 Excellent Pilot compensation not a factor for Highly Desirable desired performance 2 Good Pilot compensation not a factor for Negligible deficiencies desired performance 3 Fair Minimal pilot compensation required Some mildly for desired performance Unpleasant deficiencies 4 Minor but annoying Desired performance requires moderate Deficiencies pilot compensation. 5 Moderately objectionable Adequate performance requires considerable Deficiencies pilot compensation 6 Very objectionable but Adequate performance requires extensive Tolerable deficiencies pilot compensation 7 Major Deficiencies Adequate performance not attainable with maximum tolerable pilot compensation. Controllability not in question. 8 Major deficiencies Considerable pilot compensation is required for control. 9 Major deficiencies Intense pilot compensation is required to retain control. 10 Major Deficiencies Control will be lost during some portion of required operations. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Geez... Ya mean my plane rates at 9.5?
Gulp.... Harry |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nothing to add, I just thought I'd post a version reformatted so that
it doesn't rely on tabs to establish columns: 1 Excellent Highly Desirable Pilot compensation not a factor for desired performance 2 Good Pilot compensation not a factor for desired performance Negligible deficiencies 3 Fair Minimal pilot compensation required for desired performance Some mildly Unpleasant deficiencies 4 Minor but annoying Deficiencies Desired performance requires moderate pilot compensation. 5 Moderately objectionable Deficiencies Adequate performance requires considerable pilot compensation 6 Very objectionable but Tolerable deficiencies Adequate performance requires extensive pilot compensation 7 Major Deficiencies Adequate performance not attainable with maximum tolerable pilot compensation. Controllability not in question. 8 Major deficiencies Considerable pilot compensation is required for control. 9 Major deficiencies Intense pilot compensation is required to retain control. 10 Major Deficiencies Control will be lost during some portion of required operations. Bob K. http://www.hpaircraft.com/hp-24 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wright1902glider wrote:
Geez... Ya mean my plane rates at 9.5? Gulp.... Harry Hi Harry, WAY back then, just getting airborne and back down again safely would rate it as a 1. Times have definitely changed.... Richard |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Kuykendall" wrote in message oups.com... Nothing to add, I just thought I'd post a version reformatted so that it doesn't rely on tabs to establish columns: Thanks. I was not quite sure what order some of them were to go in, With the Somewhat random Use of capital Letters. ;-) -- Jim in NC |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard,
Now that you mention it, I guess it was the #1 of its day. After all, it could both bank AND turn! Imagine that! Of course, every other flying machine of the day was a 10+. Makes me wonder where a Gee Bee rates on the scale though. Harry "mother of all airplanes" Frey |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wright1902glider wrote:
Richard, Now that you mention it, I guess it was the #1 of its day. After all, it could both bank AND turn! Imagine that! Of course, every other flying machine of the day was a 10+. Makes me wonder where a Gee Bee rates on the scale though. Harry "mother of all airplanes" Frey I think that would depend on who is flying the Gee Bee. Doolitle managed to fly it and survived, but he was about the only one (back then). I always suspected it had something to do with the pilot(?). Richard |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Lamb wrote:
control. 10 Major Deficiencies Control will be lost during some portion of required operations. Pretty much describes my sex life... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "wright1902glider" wrote in message oups.com... Richard, Now that you mention it, I guess it was the #1 of its day. After all, it could both bank AND turn! Imagine that! Of course, every other flying machine of the day was a 10+. Makes me wonder where a Gee Bee rates on the scale though. Harry "mother of all airplanes" Frey Actually, the Gee Bee isn't all that bad. Better than my old Stits Playmate! It had a top speed in level flight of 110 mph and the first indication of an approaching stall was an uncontrolled snap roll to the right at 98 mph! I had to dive down final at full throttle in order to get Vso + 30 % that they recommend for approach speed! :-) Highflyer Highflight Aviation Services Pinckneyville Airport ( PJY ) 10th Annual rec.aviation flyin at Pinckneyville May 19, 20, and 21. Email Mary at if you are planning to come or we may not have groceries for you for lunch and dinner! :-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Aw Rating merger and Today's ASW | Charlie Wolf | Naval Aviation | 5 | May 12th 05 10:34 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
Piper Aztec handling qualities | John McFarlane | Owning | 1 | October 3rd 03 04:11 PM |
Enlisted pilots | John Randolph | Naval Aviation | 41 | July 21st 03 02:11 PM |