![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stan Gosnell" wrote in message ... "Kelly Bakst" wrote in : First off, everything inside the 10nm circle on NOAA plates is to scale - meaning you can indeed georeference them. By "Fly on them" on mean a system that will use your GPS location and plot your position on top of the plate. 'To scale' and 'accurately plotted' are not the same thing. If you just want a general idea, then it might work. What app do you plan to use to display both the chart graphic and the GPS position? I have done quite a bit of this, plotting gps tracks on georeferenced NACO approach plates. I use Oziexplorer, which also has a "moving map" mode, though I've never used it real-time that way. I posted some examples on alt.binaries.pictures.aviation under the title "Approach Plate Track Plotting". I doubt there is any way to automatically georeference the images, but I have a growing collection of manually georeferenced plates. Cheers, John Clonts Temple, Texas N7NZ |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Clonts" wrote in
: I doubt there is any way to automatically georeference the images, but I have a growing collection of manually georeferenced plates. So, John, would you bet your life on your manual georeferencing? -- Regards, Stan |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stan Gosnell wrote in message ...
"John Clonts" wrote in : I doubt there is any way to automatically georeference the images, but I have a growing collection of manually georeferenced plates. So, John, would you bet your life on your manual georeferencing? No, but I don't bet my life on my handheld moving-map GPS either, when I use it to "monitor" a VOR approach. But it sure is useful nonetheless. Also, like I said, I've only used them to plot gps tracks after the fact, in the comfort of my living room. Cheers, John Clonts Temple, Texas N7NZ |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stan Gosnell writes:
Maybe as a backup, just to follow along, but the standard Jepp plate is about as small as is practical, I think. We're starting to investigate some electronic flight bags, with the approach plates built in, and those might work, but a screen the size of a PDA is just too small to work with, as a sole source of approach information. It would beat getting the information from a controller. --kyler |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stan Gosnell writes:
I doubt there is any way to automatically georeference the images, but I have a growing collection of manually georeferenced plates. So, John, would you bet your life on your manual georeferencing? I missed it. When did we start betting our lives on handheld moving maps? "Hmmm...the needle's at full deflection but it sure looks like I'm nowhere close to that mountain so I guess I'll just take a look..." --kyler |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kyler Laird wrote in news
![]() Stan Gosnell writes: Maybe as a backup, just to follow along, but the standard Jepp plate is about as small as is practical, I think. We're starting to investigate some electronic flight bags, with the approach plates built in, and those might work, but a screen the size of a PDA is just too small to work with, as a sole source of approach information. It would beat getting the information from a controller. --kyler Maybe. But it sure wouldn't beat getting it from a standard approach plate. Or an electronic depiction of a plate at standard size. Miniaturization is wonderful for some things, not so great for others. -- Regards, Stan |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kyler Laird wrote in :
I missed it. When did we start betting our lives on handheld moving maps? I don't know. IIRC, this all started when I asked what you were going to do with the charts on the PDA, and I seemed to get the impression you wanted to use them for flying approaches. Maybe I misunderstood you. If you're using them for approach information, you're betting your life on them. -- Regards, Stan |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stan Gosnell writes:
]]] So, John, would you bet your life on your manual georeferencing? I missed it. When did we start betting our lives on handheld moving maps? I don't know. IIRC, this all started when I asked what you were going to do with the charts on the PDA, and I seemed to get the impression you wanted to use them for flying approaches. Maybe I misunderstood you. If you're using them for approach information, you're betting your life on them. I'm not using a PDA for any of the flight stuff I do ('cept weight and balance calculations and sometimes a DUATS call). Even if someone does use a PDA to display the approach data, that's quite a bit different than "betting your life" on the accuracy of the georeferencing used for moving map display. If you want to get into the difference of depending on reading altitudes and frequencies from a PDA vs. a piece of paper, that's another (interesting) topic but it certainly doesn't have anything to do with the georeferencing you mentioned. Speaking of "manual georeferencing"...how do you think the sectional images are done? --kyler |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kyler Laird wrote in message ...
What's wrong with scrolling? Do you really need to see the entire plate when you're on the approach? I find myself checking and double-checking things on different parts of the plate throughout the approach. I hate scrolling to see the full page of a website I'm looking at sitting on my ass in front of the computer, let alone while I'm bouncing through the clouds. I'm using a pen computer with a nice big screen for my experiments these days. I'm much more comfortable with that size. I find the paper plates to be absolutely perfect in terms of size in particular and human factors in general. Plus no batteries, NMEA, anything to worry about. OK, having a little plane tracking my position around them would be nice, but I'll survive until I can afford an MFD for that. Any kind of moving map can provide most of that, and I just can't imagine flying without paper plates (cups optional). -cwk. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The thread started because I want a full set of approach plates on my PDA
rather than paper. Unlike others, I have no problem at all using the plate on the PDA - when you think about flying an approach, you realize that you use it only at specific "phases" of the approach. If you have your head down staring at the plate for long periods of time, you probably need some help. The tracking of the aircraft over the plate by georeferencing it is only for additional situational awareness. It's not legal to use for navigation - not on a handheld, anyway. I must point out, however, that the MX20 does exactly this (on Jepp plates) very nicely. Kelly "Stan Gosnell" wrote in message ... Kyler Laird wrote in : I missed it. When did we start betting our lives on handheld moving maps? I don't know. IIRC, this all started when I asked what you were going to do with the charts on the PDA, and I seemed to get the impression you wanted to use them for flying approaches. Maybe I misunderstood you. If you're using them for approach information, you're betting your life on them. -- Regards, Stan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
data plates | Del Rawlins | Home Built | 2 | August 21st 04 10:34 PM |
online Canadian approach plates | Robert M. Gary | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | July 6th 04 04:43 AM |
Buttonville Approach Plates | Defly | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | May 22nd 04 07:40 PM |
NACO approach plates | J Haggerty | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | April 19th 04 04:04 AM |
AVIATIONTOOLBOX: I've added your approach plates. | Kyler Laird | Instrument Flight Rules | 20 | April 19th 04 12:02 AM |