![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How many cars are on the roads you use to get to the gliderport?
How many gliders fly at at the gliderport? jeplane wrote: Not sure I agree with Ramy entirely... How many traffic accidents have you seen through the years while driving to the gliderport? In that same time frame, how many gliders acidents have you seen at that gliderport? Richard Phoenix, AZ On Oct 30, 5:50 pm, Ramy wrote: " No matter how safe you think you are, the risk is still significantly higher than most normal activities (such as driving). " |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You might want to think of adding a Ballistic Recover Chute to your glider
safety upgrades. Mike Schumann "Chip Bearden" wrote in message ups.com... Soaring is riskier than driving a car. Competition soaring and aggressive cross-country soaring are riskier, still, although they are typically practiced by more experienced pilots who should (key word) know how to manage those risks. There's a good article about safety and risk by former World Champion Bruno Gantenbrink on DG's Web site: http://www.dg-flugzeugbau.de/index-e.html. If you fly cross-country or competitively and haven't read it, please do. I grew up mouthing the cliche (an international one, apparently, based on Bruno's article) that the most dangerous part of soaring was the drive to the airport. In fact, flying is the most dangerous part. In 40+ years of soaring, I've lost quite a few friends and acquaintances to glider crashes, including my father and my best friend, both highly experienced pilots. I've been first on the scene at fatal crashes. I think about the potential downside consequences of soaring before every contest and often when driving to the gliderport (although, oddly, seldom when I'm flying). I've got two 13-year-old daughters who would be devasted if something happened to me while flying. Yet I continue to fly. Soaring is the most fulfilling, exciting, rewarding activity I participate in, and I feel more alive for it. Nothing matches the exhilaration of completing a task or an ambitious flight knowing I've flown well. And I'm honest enough to admit that if soaring were completely risk free, it wouldn't have the same appeal. I suspect more than a few of my fellow pilots share this "condition" although I would describe none of them as thrill seekers or dare devils. Yet I do everything I can to minimize the risks balanced against my desire to compete and fly cross country. I bought my current glider because it had a safety cockpit and impact-absorbing landing gear. I equipped it with a canopy wire deflector bar, an ELT, a 6-point safety harness, a rear-view mirror, and more than a gallon of easily accessible drinking water. All this was to keep me out of trouble and to help me survive trouble if it occurs. I'm considering installing a transponder or a portable collision avoidance device to reduce what I think is my biggest risk currently--being hit by a power plane in the busy airspace where I fly west of New York City. I'm probably more cautious than some. I know my limits and don't knowingly exceed them. Soaring isn't for everyone. One pilot I know, a good one, dropped out of soaring after his wife got sick and died. As much as he loved soaring, his children were young and he didn't feel it was fair to them to continue something that increased the risk they might end up losing both parents. He intends to get back in the game when they're older. I think he made the right call for him. I confess that when I was in my 20s, I not only mouthed the cliche about driving being more dangerous than flying, but I glorified the risks that even then I acknowledged existed in order to enhance the sense that I was doing something special, something extreme, something most people would never experience. Now in my 50s, I see that part of the appeal of soaring is the ability to push myself up against the edge of the cliff, look over it, and then back away. I don't need or want the risk that a power pilot flying head down and locked will plow into me from behind (as nearly happened a few months ago) or the risk that someone above me in the gaggle will make a mistake and spin down through my altitude (as happened a few years ago). The challenge is to work with the risks I can control. It's the ones I can't control--and I'd be in denial if I said they didn't exist--that trouble me. There are enough of those, plus the risk that I will make a bad mistake someday (I'm not in denial about that, either), to remind me that soaring is inherently risky compared with most of the other things I do. To date, those risks are not sufficient to cause me to quit soaring. But we're all different and what works for me may not apply to anyone else. Chip Bearden ASW 24 "JB" USA -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 30, 6:50 pm, Ramy wrote:
" No matter how safe you think you are, the risk is still significantly higher than most normal activities (such as driving)" You sure? How many times have you seen a traffic accident on your way to the gliderport? In the same time frame, how many glider accidents have you seen in that same airport? Although I can appreciate what Patrick is going through, stopping from flying ARE NOT going to stop accidents from happening. And I doubt the deads would have want us to stop anyway... |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 31, 2:11 pm, Marc Ramsey wrote:
How many cars are on the roads you use to get to the gliderport? How many gliders fly at at the gliderport? So you are telling me driving is safer than flying? Not sure if I would drive or fly with you!...:-) |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Every so often a thread like this gets started on the
UK ras. Normally it's a reporter looking for a story to sensationalise. We mostly ignore it and don't give them any ammo |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[apologies if this is a double-post - the first one didn't seem to go
through] On Oct 31, 4:04 pm, jeplane wrote: On Oct 30, 6:50 pm, Ramy wrote: " No matter how safe you think you are, the risk is still significantly higher than most normal activities (such as driving)" You sure? How many times have you seen a traffic accident on your way to the gliderport?... That question reflects a very typical, but not very productive approach to the issue at hand. The plural of "anecdote" is not "data." Data such as that in this PDF is why I personally feel fairly certain when I say that flying gliders is considerably riskier than most of what you'd call "normal activities": http://www.ntsb.gov/publictn/2007/ARG0701.pdf See page 15, which shows (for year 2003) bar graphs for both the raw total and fatal accident numbers per general aviation sector, and the total and fatal accidents per hours flown for each sector. Observe that the numbers for gliders are 19.45 accidents per 100,000 hours flown, with 5.07 fatal accidents per 100,000 hours. That's second only to amateur-built aircraft, with 21.6 and 5.5 respectively. Contrast that with the numbers for single-engine piston-powered airplanes with 7.91 accidents and 1.41 fatal accidents per 100,000 hours. In 2003 at least, gliders had 245% more accidents and 360% more fatal accidents per hour than the puddle-jumpers that comprise the majority of the US general aviation fleet. There's no breakdown for poor saps like me who combine the two worst categories by dabbling in amateur-built gliders, but my bet is that the numbers would be somewhere between the two. As concerns comparisons between the accident rates of flying and driving, I defer to this analysis by Harry Mantakos: http://www.meretrix.com/~harry/flyin...vsdriving.html Given those numbers, I normally feel fairly confident when I say that soaring is much more dangerous than driving, and is perhaps comparable to riding a motorcycle. But I do tend to get odd looks when I go on to say that I gave up riding on the street and took up Formula IV roadracing (125cc anything-goes full-fairing 2-stroke bikes with top speed of about 100 mph) because I thought it was safer as well as more fun. Bottom line: I don't recommend flying or soaring to just everybody. Based on what I know about their methods, means, and risk aversion, for some folks I recommend knitting or photography. Thanks, Bob K. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 31, 4:04 pm, jeplane wrote:
On Oct 30, 6:50 pm, Ramy wrote: " No matter how safe you think you are, the risk is still significantly higher than most normal activities (such as driving)" You sure? How many times have you seen a traffic accident on your way to the gliderport? In the same time frame, how many glider accidents have you seen in that same airport? Although I can appreciate what Patrick is going through, stopping from flying ARE NOT going to stop accidents from happening. And I doubt the deads would have want us to stop anyway... Yes, I am sure and I think Marc explained it very well. No need to be a rocket scientist to do the math. Couple of posters on this thread clearly don't understand basic statistics. And yes, stopping from flying WILL stop flying accident to happen to those who stops flying. But I agree with you with one thing, the deads would not want us to stop flying. But I am also sympathise with those who got traumatized witnessing accidents and losing friends. And don't get me wrong, I am not advocating stopping flying, in the contrary, I will be the last one to stop, but at least I do not live in denial as some others, am very well aware that there is a big risk and I have only partial control of the risk as I am human and all human are prone to mistakes, and I am willing to take the risk since it worth it for me. As my new bumper sticker says "I live to fly and I fly to live" and hopefully I'll be able to do it for years to come. Ramy |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jeplane wrote:
On Oct 31, 2:11 pm, Marc Ramsey wrote: How many cars are on the roads you use to get to the gliderport? How many gliders fly at at the gliderport? So you are telling me driving is safer than flying? Not sure if I would drive or fly with you!...:-) I think most of us that have been in the sport for 20 or 30 years have known more people that were killed in glider accidents than car accidents. If you limit it to glider pilots killed in cars versus in gliders, it makes glider flying look even more dangerous. As a group, we manage to drive cars much more safely than we fly our gliders, in good part because (as already mentioned elsewhere) glider flying is much less forgiving. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 31, 12:51 pm, jeplane wrote:
Not sure I agree with Ramy entirely... How many traffic accidents have you seen through the years while driving to the gliderport? In that same time frame, how many gliders acidents have you seen at that gliderport? Richard Phoenix, AZ On Oct 30, 5:50 pm, Ramy wrote: " No matter how safe you think you are, the risk is still significantly higher than most normal activities (such as driving). " Not as many road accidents as I have seen at the gliderport!! Lets face it guys Gliding is Dangerous. Very Dangerous if you start to push the envelope of your experience and comfort level. I have lost over the years more than 10 friends or acquaintances. When I raced sailboats or windsurfed I never lost any! This summer was a real bad one for me loosing a very close flying buddy Geoff Loyns, then Steve Fossett goes missing and now Stew. All I knew through soaring, hanging at the airport or conversing on here and emails. I love soaring and think it has given me some of the best memories of my life. But as I look at my young son I am drawn between the selfish urge to mental floss with soaring and the reality of life. Running a Start up company with employees that rely on my breathing and working is another factor. I will probably keep flying but in a different way than I used to. My flying will be less risky and not as aggressive as previous years. I want to also explore other sides of soaring that I have not experienced as much, such as enjoying the moment more than chasing after distance/speed. Don't get me wrong Soaring is an amazing sport but you have to realize it is dangerous. It is the only sport I know where if you screw up you will probably die!! That is a sobering thought for sure. Any one who tells you otherwise either is on crack or has not been around the sport for a long time. Just hang around the glider port long enough and you WILL loose flying friends. It is a fact most people die in bed smelling of urine and lysol, So the trade off here is gliding or pressing the button above your bed screaming for the nurse to change your bed pan!! On that note I will stop waffling.. Regards Al |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Those *dangerous* Korean War relics | Kingfish | Piloting | 192 | June 19th 06 07:06 PM |
Okay, so maybe flying *is* dangerous... | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 51 | August 31st 05 03:02 AM |
Dangerous Stuff | [email protected] | Rotorcraft | 21 | July 16th 05 05:55 PM |
New news Soaring is dangerous ? | R Barry | Soaring | 29 | October 3rd 04 03:40 AM |
small airplanes are dangerous | JimTheBoatMan | Piloting | 31 | April 29th 04 10:44 PM |