![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "AIA" a écrit dans le message de news: ... Pierre-Henri Baras wrote: "AIA" a écrit dans le message de news: ... Money to save USA from Troubles in Iraq? No Thanks we have more serious way to spend our money... For example to build a common European defence to definitively kill NATO. By buying F-16s, Apaches and C-130s????? Great move...... Talk with the polish... Italy is partecipating to the Typhoon and a-400 programs ....but just started to receive interim F-16s and bought C-130Js a few years back. PHB |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pierre-Henri Baras wrote:
"AIA" a écrit dans le message de news: ... Pierre-Henri Baras wrote: "AIA" a écrit dans le message de news: ... Money to save USA from Troubles in Iraq? No Thanks we have more serious way to spend our money... For example to build a common European defence to definitively kill NATO. By buying F-16s, Apaches and C-130s????? Great move...... Talk with the polish... Italy is partecipating to the Typhoon and a-400 programs ...but just started to receive interim F-16s and bought C-130Js a few years back. PHB Think about we have yet F-104 for air defence (the only country in the world i suppose) F-16 is only a leasing and we bought c-130j because our c-130h were to old to stay in service for the next ten years... |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Pierre-Henri Baras" wrote: "Cub Driver" a écrit dans le message de news: ... How can anyone take Europe seriously as a force in the world? It's easy. Don't forget why Irak has to be rebuilt. Thirty years of Europe ignoring the problem, for one. The amount of damage caused by Us forces pales in comparison to what their own government had done. Hell, we're spending millions upon millions rebuilding schools and hospitals that had no war damage whatsoever. -- cirby at cfl.rr.com Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations. Slam on brakes accordingly. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Franck" wrote: You destruct Irak, Why we must pay ? Because we didn't destruct Iraq. Most of the rebuilding moeny is going for such controversial things as building and painting schools, and buying books that don't have photos of Saddam on the covers. -- cirby at cfl.rr.com Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations. Slam on brakes accordingly. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Roman J. Rohleder wrote: (BUFDRVR) schrieb: You were unable to handle a uniquely European problem in the Balkans, why must we continue to pay? Since when is a genocide a "uniquely European problem"? Well, it's much more *professional* in Europe.... -- cirby at cfl.rr.com Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations. Slam on brakes accordingly. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chad Irby schrieb:
You were unable to handle a uniquely European problem in the Balkans, why must we continue to pay? Since when is a genocide a "uniquely European problem"? Well, it's much more *professional* in Europe.... It´s not a topic jerk with. First, genocides are not limited to Europe (just a glimpse.. besides german crimes in 1930/1940s, there had been genocidal events in all parts of the world: Turkey/Armenia, North and South America, Indonesia, and many more. :-( ). Second, I was referring to those who had the chance to interact and prevent more cruelties. It is a crime to stand by if you have the ability to jump in as much as it is to leave before the task is done. The Balkan isn´t settled yet as the Kosovo and recent rumours and events in Serbia prove. Gruss, Roman |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Pierre-Henri Baras" wrote:
"AIA" a écrit dans le message de news: ... Pierre-Henri Baras wrote: "AIA" a écrit dans le message de news: ... Money to save USA from Troubles in Iraq? No Thanks we have more serious way to spend our money... For example to build a common European defence to definitively kill NATO. By buying F-16s, Apaches and C-130s????? Great move...... Talk with the polish... Italy is partecipating to the Typhoon and a-400 programs ...but just started to receive interim F-16s and bought C-130Js a few years back. PHB Europe should cancel the F-35 and go with Eurofighter/Rafale /Gripen hi/lo mix. **** the insolent yankee pigs. Grantland |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Emmanuel Gustin wrote:
I agree that it would be wiser for to EU to invest more in rebuilding Iraq, but on the other hand this fund amounts to giving cash to the US administration of Iraq to spend as it sees fit --- there are more fun ways to waste money. I think the US made it quite clear this was not going to be the case. Full transparency in how the money is spend, with an outside board making the decisions. None of the money going to support the US presence. Seemed fair enough. In the end, the USA is rich enough to pay for its own foreign policy. EU aid money should go to countries that are in more urgent need of it. "Paying for its own foreign policy"? That's a real hoot coming from Europe! Anyways, I personally believe there will be more glory for the US doing this ourselves, without significant help from anyone. *If* this ends up well, this will be something Americans will be very proud of looking back from 20 years, and the nay sayers will look rather cheap. If it the exercise fails, Europe can crow as it always does. SMH |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
AIA wrote:
Money to save USA from Troubles in Iraq? No Thanks we have more serious way to spend our money... For example to build a common European defence to definitively kill NATO. Excellent choice! I wish you well in the endeavor! SMH |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BUFDRVR wrote:
It's easy. Don't forget why Irak has to be rebuilt. We didn't invade Bosnia. Military forces were "permitted" to enter Bosnia through an agreement, Kosovo and Macedonia as well. This doesn't change the fact that Europe demanded US involvement even though the situation in the former Republics of Yugoslavia had no impact on US national security. As a side note, ground forces were deployed under "peaceful" circumstances, but air forces bombed targets in Bosnia, Kosovo and Serbia, once again, with US forces making up the majority. If it were up to me, I'd pull every US military member out of the Balkans to ease the Iraq burden. Europe doesn't want to help out in Iraq, fine we can ease our burden at their expense. Totally agree! It still really frosts me to hear a Euro complain that the US wasn't willing to put ground troops in the mix for Kosovo, thereby whimping out. Yet did provide something like 90% of the air assets for the Kosovo campaign, which wouldn't have happened unless the US agreed to be involved. All for interest that were nil for America. We really are dumb schmucks! SMH |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flying to Europe | Bob Webster | Instrument Flight Rules | 19 | April 26th 04 04:08 PM |
Fractional Ownership in Europe N-reg airplne | EDR | Aviation Marketplace | 2 | December 12th 03 09:42 AM |
USA armed URSS to keep down Europe | IO | Military Aviation | 9 | October 21st 03 07:19 AM |
American joke on the Brits | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 50 | September 30th 03 10:52 PM |
Airmen in Europe may go back to three-month rotation schedules | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | August 22nd 03 11:47 PM |