USA armed URSS to keep down Europe

How about "lend lease" convoys to Murmansk during the war. They fistly armed
Hitler and after Stalin to destroy Europe... USA is the worst enemy of
Europe...

"IO" wrote in message
...
How about "lend lease" convoys to Murmansk during the war. They fistly
armed
Hitler and after Stalin to destroy Europe... USA is the worst enemy of
Europe...



Pray tell what leap of logic leads you to the
assumption that the USA armed Hitler.

Was the Panzer Mk III built in Detroit ?

Did the Flak-88 originate in Pittburg ?

Are you brain dead ?

Keith

In article , says...
How about "lend lease" convoys to Murmansk during the war. They fistly armed
Hitler and after Stalin to destroy Europe... USA is the worst enemy of
Europe...

Just where did the US send lend lease to Germany ? Care to point me to
some documentation ?


Otherwise, lay off the boose dude.





--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

IO wrote:

How about "lend lease" convoys to Murmansk during the war. They fistly armed
Hitler and after Stalin to destroy Europe... USA is the worst enemy of
Europe...

Hamburg, Germany, a favorite stopover port of US merchant mariners taking
ships loaded with Lend-Lease war material for the USSR to Murmansk.

While there, they could warm up, buy extra cold weather gear, and have a
few brauts and beer provided by friendly merchants of the city, before
continuing northward on their war supply missions.

After the war, the US refused to take "no" for an answer from Stalin, in
regards to Marshall Plan reconstruction aid, and instead *forced* military
supplies into Russian ports against the will of the government, with the
hope that a Cold War would rage for the next century, making Europe dependent
on US largess.

The plan almost worked! If only the Cold War could have lasted a few more
decades. We could have been the masters of Europe!


SMH

From: Stephen Harding

snip

After the war, the US refused to take "no" for an answer from Stalin, in
regards to Marshall Plan reconstruction aid, and instead *forced* military
supplies into Russian ports against the will of the government, with the
hope that a Cold War would rage for the next century, making Europe dependent
on US largess.

The Marshall Plan was for the civil reconstruction of West Germany. Stalin was
already considered an enemy by that time, why on Earth would the United States
"force" military supplies on the Soviets other than a few items already agreed
upon during the war?

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired

"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: Stephen Harding

snip

After the war, the US refused to take "no" for an answer from Stalin, in
regards to Marshall Plan reconstruction aid, and instead *forced*
military
supplies into Russian ports against the will of the government, with the
hope that a Cold War would rage for the next century, making Europe
dependent
on US largess.

The Marshall Plan was for the civil reconstruction of West Germany. Stalin
was
already considered an enemy by that time, why on Earth would the United
States
"force" military supplies on the Soviets other than a few items already
agreed
upon during the war?

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired


Your irony detector seems to have failed.

Keith

"IO" wrote in message ...
How about "lend lease" convoys to Murmansk during the war. They fistly armed
Hitler and after Stalin to destroy Europe... USA is the worst enemy of
Europe...

Close, very close to reality. Let's them kill each other for the sake
of US. Right!!!

Michael