![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wayne Paul" wrote in message m... Eric, I've been using supernews.com. I have provided them a list of message IDs that appear on Google and are missing from the Suppernews server. I've been informed that they all were deleted from their server due to copyright violations. This is the only thread that I have seen in the last two and a half days. I sent text from several of the missing messages and ask them to identify for me the copyright infringements. As a result the trouble call has been moved up to "management" for resolution. Supernews is a paid-for service which have been happy with for the past eight years. This is my first problem and it is a major one. Wayne "Eric Greenwell" wrote in message ... On 3/29/2012 9:56 PM, Wayne Paul wrote: Eric, What News Group reader are you using? Besides this thread, my last new thread is "Smoken fast climb" posted on the 27th at 12:47. Wayne "Eric Greenwell" wrote in message ... On 3/29/2012 7:51 PM, Wayne Paul wrote: I've been having problems with my rec.aviation.soaring news feed for the past three days. As a result, I haven't received any new threads. I have contacted my provider and am still working on the problem. This message is a test to see if the problem has been resolved. I got your message; interestingly, I've been getting about 20% of the usual traffic the last couple days. Maybe there is a more wide-spread problem? I use Seamonkey 2.8 (essentially a Firefox/Thunderbird combo: browser, email, html editor, and some bits I don't use). I get the group from the nntp.aioe.org newsgroup server. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "Transponders in Sailplanes - Feb/2010" also ADS-B, PCAS, Flarm http://tinyurl.com/yb3xywl I reported this problem to Google Groups. It seems to reside there. I've posted via the eternal-september nntp server and it never arrived in Google Groups r.a.s. My posts on GG r.a.s. haven't arrived on either eternal-september or aoie nntps. I've had to reload the GG page serveral times recently (new version of application cited) to view the latest posts. FWIW, there's talk on the NANOG list (North American Network Operators Group) of uunet newsfeed/newsreader ending today, 3/31. I suspect that the old uunet newsfeed became part of Verizon Business through mergers and acquisitions as it was announced as uunet/vzb. In any event that newsfeed is probably long term and peered with a number of other nntp servers. It's possible there are some peering gaps, or will be after today. Still, the common core problem appears to be at Google. Frank Whiteley |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/30/2012 11:18 PM, Wayne Paul wrote:
Eric, I've been using supernews.com. I have provided them a list of message IDs that appear on Google and are missing from the Suppernews server. I've been informed that they all were deleted from their server due to copyright violations. This is the only thread that I have seen in the last two and a half days. I sent text from several of the missing messages and ask them to identify for me the copyright infringements. As a result the trouble call has been moved up to "management" for resolution. Supernews is a paid-for service which have been happy with for the past eight years. This is my first problem and it is a major one. Wayne Snip... I used to pull my messages from aioe.org for several years, switched to eternal-september.org ~a year ago after aioe had some issues, quickly/non-rigorously cross-checked against both when this latest issue appeared (both seemed to have the same issues with the same [missing] posts), and as y'all DO see some posts on Google that have not appeared on either of the (both) free providers. FWIW, the 'copyright issue' claim can easily be seen to be 100% bogus. Bob W. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wayne Paul" wrote in message
m... I've been having problems with my rec.aviation.soaring news feed for the past three days. As a result, I haven't received any new threads. I have contacted my provider and am still working on the problem. This message is a test to see if the problem has been resolved. You could go try news.aioe.org, if you can live without binaries. It never misses a beat, and is free, to boot! -- Jim in NC |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, April 1, 2012 5:24:25 PM UTC-6, Morgans wrote:
"Wayne Paul" wrote in message m... I've been having problems with my rec.aviation.soaring news feed for the past three days. As a result, I haven't received any new threads. I have contacted my provider and am still working on the problem. This message is a test to see if the problem has been resolved. You could go try news.aioe.org, if you can live without binaries. It never misses a beat, and is free, to boot! -- Jim in NC Nothing posted in Google Groups appears on either aioe.org or eternal-september.org. External postings have arrived in GG, but it's been quiet out there. Seems much of the issue is with GG apart from the uunet/vzb newsfeed ending 3/31. Frank Whiteley |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim,
I'm afraid that news.aioe.org is suffering the same problems that are plaguing supernews.com. If you want to make a comparison, here is a link to Google's version of rec.aviation.soaring. http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...?lnk=srg&hl=en Wayne "Morgans" wrote in message ... "Wayne Paul" wrote in message m... I've been having problems with my rec.aviation.soaring news feed for the past three days. As a result, I haven't received any new threads. I have contacted my provider and am still working on the problem. This message is a test to see if the problem has been resolved. You could go try news.aioe.org, if you can live without binaries. It never misses a beat, and is free, to boot! -- Jim in NC |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/31/2012 9:02 AM, Skyslicer wrote:
I reported this problem to Google Groups. It seems to reside there. The obvious cure? Stop posting via Google groups! Google has been trying to kill Usenet for years. Any problem that is being caused by them is highly unlikely to get fixed by them. Vaughn |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, April 2, 2012 6:22:20 AM UTC-6, Vaughn wrote:
On 3/31/2012 9:02 AM, Skyslicer wrote: I reported this problem to Google Groups. It seems to reside there. The obvious cure? Stop posting via Google groups! Google has been trying to kill Usenet for years. Any problem that is being caused by them is highly unlikely to get fixed by them. Vaughn Looks like the Google Groups bottleneck has cleared. USENET is still in very wide use. The worst thing that happened were the binary news groups. That upped the bandwidth and storage a bunch while both were still expensive. Now USENET servers are run pretty economically considering the other bandwidth hogs out there. The spammers have stopped using USENET for e-mail harvesting. What I like about USENET is the push. No forum hunting. Not as limited as lists. More engaging than RSS feeds. Then there are the flames;^) Yeah, GG's new interface is no favorite. Frank Whiteley Frank Whiteley |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looks like GG is not propagating postings again for at least 13 hours.
"Frank Whiteley" wrote in message news:19039670.685.1333410064857.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynjd4... On Monday, April 2, 2012 6:22:20 AM UTC-6, Vaughn wrote: On 3/31/2012 9:02 AM, Skyslicer wrote: I reported this problem to Google Groups. It seems to reside there. The obvious cure? Stop posting via Google groups! Google has been trying to kill Usenet for years. Any problem that is being caused by them is highly unlikely to get fixed by them. Vaughn Looks like the Google Groups bottleneck has cleared. USENET is still in very wide use. The worst thing that happened were the binary news groups. That upped the bandwidth and storage a bunch while both were still expensive. Now USENET servers are run pretty economically considering the other bandwidth hogs out there. The spammers have stopped using USENET for e-mail harvesting. What I like about USENET is the push. No forum hunting. Not as limited as lists. More engaging than RSS feeds. Then there are the flames;^) Yeah, GG's new interface is no favorite. Frank Whiteley Frank Whiteley |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Still receiving though.
"Skyslicer" wrote in message ... Looks like GG is not propagating postings again for at least 13 hours. "Frank Whiteley" wrote in message news:19039670.685.1333410064857.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynjd4... On Monday, April 2, 2012 6:22:20 AM UTC-6, Vaughn wrote: On 3/31/2012 9:02 AM, Skyslicer wrote: I reported this problem to Google Groups. It seems to reside there. The obvious cure? Stop posting via Google groups! Google has been trying to kill Usenet for years. Any problem that is being caused by them is highly unlikely to get fixed by them. Vaughn Looks like the Google Groups bottleneck has cleared. USENET is still in very wide use. The worst thing that happened were the binary news groups. That upped the bandwidth and storage a bunch while both were still expensive. Now USENET servers are run pretty economically considering the other bandwidth hogs out there. The spammers have stopped using USENET for e-mail harvesting. What I like about USENET is the push. No forum hunting. Not as limited as lists. More engaging than RSS feeds. Then there are the flames;^) Yeah, GG's new interface is no favorite. Frank Whiteley Frank Whiteley |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, April 4, 2012 10:09:51 AM UTC-6, Frank Whiteley wrote:
Still receiving though. "Skyslicer" wrote in message ... Looks like GG is not propagating postings again for at least 13 hours. "Frank Whiteley" wrote in message news:19039670.685.1333410064857.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynjd4... On Monday, April 2, 2012 6:22:20 AM UTC-6, Vaughn wrote: On 3/31/2012 9:02 AM, Skyslicer wrote: I reported this problem to Google Groups. It seems to reside there. The obvious cure? Stop posting via Google groups! Google has been trying to kill Usenet for years. Any problem that is being caused by them is highly unlikely to get fixed by them. Vaughn Looks like the Google Groups bottleneck has cleared. USENET is still in very wide use. The worst thing that happened were the binary news groups. That upped the bandwidth and storage a bunch while both were still expensive. Now USENET servers are run pretty economically considering the other bandwidth hogs out there. The spammers have stopped using USENET for e-mail harvesting. What I like about USENET is the push. No forum hunting. Not as limited as lists. More engaging than RSS feeds. Then there are the flames;^) Yeah, GG's new interface is no favorite. Frank Whiteley Frank Whiteley One the other way for checking. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Below the line | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 56 | March 28th 07 12:36 AM |
thrust line for engine and not mounting engine on this thrust line | tommyann | Home Built | 8 | December 15th 06 03:31 PM |
Red line | Emilio | Military Aviation | 2 | June 5th 04 04:49 AM |
Getting students to line up with the center line | BoDEAN | Piloting | 27 | April 21st 04 11:23 AM |