![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
more at
http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone...-capable-rates The reliability of various USAF aircraft has always been a hot topic within defense circles, but the reality of keeping different platforms in the air has made mainstream news as of late. At the same time, the average person seems to be a bit surprised by the actual number of different types of aircraft in the Air Force's inventory. So a simple chart showing both metrics would be very helpful, and that's exactly what our friends over at Scramble posted on their Facebook page recently. The list, which was sourced from the USAF'S data by the Air Force Times, includes four years of mission capable rate (aircraft can fly with all combat systems functional) data as well as the historical change for each platform, for better or worse. The inventory as of 2017 for each aircraft is also posted in its own column. Some may be surprised that even with all the USAF's complaining about how old and unreliable the airframes are, the E-8C JSTARS was still able to pull off a mission capable rate of 64 percent in 2017, and a respectable 76 percent in 2016. Meanwhile the relatively small fleet of F-22s hit an abysmal 49 percent—basically you need two aircraft available for one sortie—in 2017, down from a paltry 60 percent the year earlier. This is the cost of flying a low-observable, "thoroughbred" fighter. Considering only about 125 are combat coded for front line service at any given, this figure is even more troubling. Over a decade after taking its first flight, the F-35A continues to struggle as well with a 55 percent mission capable rate. This has been a major story as of late, and even though the USAF and Lockheed Martin are working to increase the aircraft's availability, still only around half are available at any given time. The test fleet full of early examples also draws down this number, but the cost of upgrading those jets to current standard is going to be very high, and still they are unlikely to be on an equal level with their newer counterparts. * |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Miloch" wrote in message news
![]() more at http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone...-capable-rates Also: https://tinyurl.com/ydbvl39v https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/y...-ready-to-fly/ https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/y...-pilot-crisis/ As for the Russkies: https://tinyurl.com/y9vah2xz http://www.businessinsider.com/russi...overuse-2015-7 https://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/ru...hin-1794966734 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ILEC SN10 utilities Windows installer (64-bit capable) | Dave Nadler | Soaring | 4 | November 11th 11 01:53 PM |
After you have taken your closet inventory and compared it to theabove staple list, you are ready to start shopping for used clothes. | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | April 26th 08 07:49 PM |
Getting current/capable again | Jeremiah Bess | Piloting | 7 | March 3rd 08 01:50 PM |
How capable are Saudi F-15s? | Matt Wiser | Military Aviation | 20 | September 15th 03 09:24 AM |
Iran Capable of Hitting Israel | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 21 | July 17th 03 09:14 PM |