![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
kinsell wrote on 10/12/2020 11:40 AM:
On 10/12/20 8:46 AM, kinsell wrote: On 10/8/20 6:54 PM, 2G wrote: On Thursday, October 8, 2020 at 1:14:30 PM UTC-7, Mana wrote: You'll get at least 2m/s dry. But like PF says, better to take a tow to 400m and use the FES straight and level until you find a thermal. It's much more efficient in level flight than climbing. On the Shark, based on a test flight I think that you will get less than 2m/s as it is a heavier glider than Matthew's Diana 2 :-). *From the FES manual: 5.3.4.1 Rate of climb The* maximum rate* of climb* is* available* only* for* a* few minutes* with* fully* charged battery packs. As battery voltage is reduced, the maximum achievable climb rate is lower. The average rate of climb depends mostly on the type of sailplane and its take-off weight. Maximum attainable altitude gain that in standard atmosphere conditions depends on the type* of* sailplane,* its* weight* and aerodynamic* qualities.* To achieve the maximum altitude* gain, use about* 15kW* of* power. Do* not* use* full* power* as* the efficiency of* the system* is* lower. Usually, 80-85* km/h is* best for the* climb with positive flap setting (the same setting as used while thermaling). Here are rough numbers: •1600 m (5200 ft) for UL sailplanes at 300kg take-off weight, i.e. Silent 2 Electro •1400* m (4500* ft)* for* the* 18m* class* sailplanes* at* 400kg take-off weight* (without water ballast), i.e.LAK17A FES •1200* m* (3900* ft) for* the* 18m* class* sailplanes* at* 450kg take-off weight* (without water ballast); LAK17B FES, Ventus 2cxa FES, Discus 2c FES, HPH 304ES Sounds like a very marginal self-launch system and is really just a decent self-retrieve (turbo) setup. Tom These gliders are sustainers only. Looks like the Silent 2 is rated for self-launch. As is the miniLak FES, also a 13.5M glider. It works well for them because they are lighter than the 18M gliders. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorg...ad-the-guide-1 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why Isn't Vx The Best Rate Of Climb? | RandyL | Piloting | 18 | September 28th 06 07:50 PM |
figuring Rate of Climb | Michael Horowitz | Home Built | 1 | June 19th 05 03:16 AM |
Newbie question on Rate of Climb | Wright1902Glider | Home Built | 0 | August 17th 04 03:48 PM |
Rate of climb | Dillon Pyron | Home Built | 3 | May 8th 04 01:08 PM |
Climb Rate for DG-600M | Steve B | Soaring | 5 | August 25th 03 08:17 AM |