![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John" wrote: So, what is magic about the 1350 degree sea-level full rich takeoff temp? Can anyone suggest any good reasons why it is not equally safe to lean to operate at the 1450 degree conditon during climb? The EGT isn't what matters; it's the CHT's that are important. As long as they don't get too high, go ahead and lean as you climb. I have an engine analyzer that I watch while I climb, using whatever mixture setting I need to keep the hottest cylinder below 400 deg, F. If 1450 degrees is good for hours and hours of continuous operation at cruise, and if cylinder temps are green, why needlessly expend more scarce fossil fuel operating at 1350 degrees? No reason at all, IMO. Won't the engine also develop more power at 1450 degrees than at 1350, which seems quite worthwhile for a number of reasons? Yep. I'm not trying to be contentious, just wondering if anyone has ideas about it that I haven't considered. I think you've got it covered. -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Newbie question on Rate of Climb | Wright1902Glider | Home Built | 0 | August 17th 04 03:48 PM |
Old airframe, new engine | Jim Strand | Naval Aviation | 52 | November 3rd 03 09:04 PM |
Leaning with EGT? | Chris W | Home Built | 3 | September 18th 03 07:28 PM |
Second Stage Climb Gradient? | Bill | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | September 15th 03 06:41 PM |
Minimum rate of climb or descent | Aaron Kahn | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | July 25th 03 03:22 PM |