![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is my understanding that the computers in cars use oxygen sensors in
the exhaust and not EGT to keep the mixture right. My question is why not use oxygen sensors in airplanes? Is EGT easier to interpret when it's a human instead of a computer controlling the mixture or is it just that it's always been done that way? -- Chris W Oklahoma City "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Historical Review of Pennsylvania |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris W wrote:
It is my understanding that the computers in cars use oxygen sensors in the exhaust and not EGT to keep the mixture right. My question is why not use oxygen sensors in airplanes? Is EGT easier to interpret when it's a human instead of a computer controlling the mixture or is it just that it's always been done that way? -- Chris W Oklahoma City "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Historical Review of Pennsylvania For one thing avgas with lead in it will poison the O2 Sensor rendering it inoperable. We may see O2 sensors sometime in the future when avgas goes to unleaded. Also the egt would measure the richer range better than an O2 sensor because the amount of O2 remaining is so small. Jim Stockton |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 11:03:30 -0500, Chris W wrote:
It is my understanding that the computers in cars use oxygen sensors in the exhaust and not EGT to keep the mixture right. My question is why not use oxygen sensors in airplanes? Is EGT easier to interpret when it's a human instead of a computer controlling the mixture or is it just that it's always been done that way? -- Chris W Oklahoma City The oxygen sensors cannot tolerate leaded fuel. Corky Scott |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chris W" wrote in message ... It is my understanding that the computers in cars use oxygen sensors in the exhaust and not EGT to keep the mixture right. My question is why not use oxygen sensors in airplanes? Is EGT easier to interpret when it's a human instead of a computer controlling the mixture or is it just You'd better stay away from 100LL then. The auto oxygen sensors will be ruined by lead. The main reason is simplicity. No "computer" is required. The EGT therocouble is about as simple as instrumentation gets. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|