PA28: Difference in constant speed prop vs fixed pitch

With my Husky, I go fastest with the prop full forward. I am not sure
if this is true with all small GA aircraft with Constant speed prop.
The Husky has essentially the same prop/engine config as the Lycoming
0-360 Mooneys.
What the CS prop gives me is a smoother ride, better fuel economy and
another knob to turn.

Nathan Young wrote in message . ..
On 7 Oct 2004 13:02:37 -0700, (PaulH) wrote:

At any altitude that permits you to develop 75% power with your
current prop, a constant speed prop won't gain you an inch unless you
want to fly at a higher power setting.

Can you better explain this? My understanding is that a fixed pitch
prop is typically a compromise in both takeoff pitch, and cruise
pitch. Using the typical car driving analogy - a prop that is stuck
in 3rd or 4th gear in a 5 speed transmission. So I would think a CS
prop would net gains at both cruise and takeoff/climb.

What the CS prop primarily gives is better climb and increased drag in
descent if you need get down in a hurry.

I've often thought a CS prop would be very beneficial in long
descents. I often cruise @ 8-11k feet, and during descent, it is easy
to redline the engine, so I have to remove some power, which decreases
the airspeed.