![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok,
in another thread we've been talking about 2 blade vs. 3 blade props, maximum tip speed and so forth. Someone posted a comment about needing really long landing gear to handle the 2 blade prop for a 1350 SHP turbine. That got me to thinking about the prop chord length and what a minimum prop speed might be. So then comes the question, why not just go to a longer-chord 2 blade prop rather than a 3 blade to handle the higher power? -- Jim Carter |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Jim Carter
wrote: Ok, in another thread we've been talking about 2 blade vs. 3 blade = props, maximum tip speed and so forth. Someone posted a comment about = needing really long landing gear to handle the 2 blade prop for a 1350 = SHP turbine. That got me to thinking about the prop chord length and = what a minimum prop speed might be. So then comes the question, why not = just go to a longer-chord 2 blade prop rather than a 3 blade to handle = the higher power? Remember that the power produced is a function of torque and rpm. So if you have a high torque engine, you can turn a large prop slowly (think helicopters). |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There's a favorite expression. up your aspect ratio.
The compromises are enough blade area to absorb the power. Enough aspect ratio to make an efficient blade. Enough blades to absorb the power (combine the first two items) Enough diameter to keep the hub losses a lesser part of the total. Short enough to clear the ground. Short enough or slow enough to keep the tips from the mach drag rise. Enough chord to keep away from low Reynold's number losses. The list goes on. Jim Carter wrote in message ... Ok, in another thread we've been talking about 2 blade vs. 3 blade props, maximum tip speed and so forth. Someone posted a comment about needing really long landing gear to handle the 2 blade prop for a 1350 SHP turbine. That got me to thinking about the prop chord length and what a minimum prop speed might be. So then comes the question, why not just go to a longer-chord 2 blade prop rather than a 3 blade to handle the higher power? -- Jim Carter |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ivo Prop on O-320 | Dave S | Home Built | 14 | October 15th 04 03:04 AM |
Landing and T/O distances (Was Cold War ALternate Basing) | Guy Alcala | Military Aviation | 3 | August 13th 04 12:18 PM |
Prop Pitch Question | Eugene Wendland | Home Built | 2 | April 25th 04 03:22 AM |
Constant Speed Prop vs Variable Engine Timing | Jay | Home Built | 44 | March 3rd 04 10:08 PM |
IVO props... comments.. | Dave S | Home Built | 16 | December 6th 03 11:43 PM |