![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Fred E. Pate" writes:
And this is for a decision altitude of only 294 ft AGL. Seems like the FAA is moving towards taking into account temperature errors in barometric alitmetry. Thanks -- that's an interesting note. And, by implication, this supports the premise that WAAS altitude figures are more accurate than the trusty old "sensitive altimeter." (In the legend they specifically state that WAAS-based VNAV can be used when BARO-VNAV is not approved due to temperature.) The altimeter becomes increasingly accurate near the ground (assuming you have the correct altimeter setting) and increasingly inaccurate away from the ground; WAAS, I'll guess, has about the same accuracy all the way down (or up). I don't know at what point they typically cross over, but it would vary depending on the temperature gradiant. All the best, David |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Different WAAS altitude readings | Wyatt Emmerich | Instrument Flight Rules | 21 | June 29th 04 07:27 PM |
GPS Altitude with WAAS | Phil Verghese | Instrument Flight Rules | 42 | October 5th 03 12:39 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
WAAS question -- altitude accuracy? | Craig Davidson | Piloting | 10 | September 23rd 03 09:56 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |