![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jay Honeck wrote in message ... How accurate is GPS for determining altitude, now that WAAS is active? I was in the air over five hours yesterday, and while droning along found that our new AvMap's altitude readout was just about dead-nuts accurate -- it was maybe 50 feet off, at times. In fact, due to the constantly changing barometric pressure along our route of flight, there were times when I might have trusted it before my altimeter. Anyone know how precise it is now? -- Jay, The FAA seems to say 3 meters vertical throughout the majority of the continental U.S. and portions of Alaska: http://gps.faa.gov/Programs/WAAS/waas.htm But the site below says 6 meters (95 percent of the time) with a worst case of 15.7 meters. http://users.erols.com/dlwilson/gpswaas.htm Here are some more interesting sites: http://waas.stanford.edu/old_metrics.html http://waas.stanford.edu/ http://www.edu-observatory.org/gps/dgps.html#WAAS |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote in message ...
How accurate is GPS for determining altitude, now that WAAS is active? I was in the air over five hours yesterday, and while droning along found that our new AvMap's altitude readout was just about dead-nuts accurate -- it was maybe 50 feet off, at times. In fact, due to the constantly changing barometric pressure along our route of flight, there were times when I might have trusted it before my altimeter. Anyone know how precise it is now? -- Jay, The FAA seems to say 3 meters vertical throughout the majority of the continental U.S. and portions of Alaska: http://gps.faa.gov/Programs/WAAS/waas.htm But the site below says 6 meters (95 percent of the time) with a worst case of 15.7 meters. http://users.erols.com/dlwilson/gpswaas.htm Beat me to replying with my link. Note the FAA site does not say if it is quoting 95%, 50% or what. As my measurements are now a little old, I will be making new ones soon. But today I will be cleaning up after not so nice a lady (Isabelle). |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was on top of Lugnaqilla mountain in Ireland today and the GPS (Meridiam
Plat) put it at 925 - 924 metres. The topo puts it at 925. Just lucky maybe... "Craig Davidson" wrote in message .net... Jay Honeck wrote in message ... How accurate is GPS for determining altitude, now that WAAS is active? I was in the air over five hours yesterday, and while droning along found that our new AvMap's altitude readout was just about dead-nuts accurate -- it was maybe 50 feet off, at times. In fact, due to the constantly changing barometric pressure along our route of flight, there were times when I might have trusted it before my altimeter. Anyone know how precise it is now? -- Jay, The FAA seems to say 3 meters vertical throughout the majority of the continental U.S. and portions of Alaska: http://gps.faa.gov/Programs/WAAS/waas.htm But the site below says 6 meters (95 percent of the time) with a worst case of 15.7 meters. http://users.erols.com/dlwilson/gpswaas.htm Here are some more interesting sites: http://waas.stanford.edu/old_metrics.html http://waas.stanford.edu/ http://www.edu-observatory.org/gps/dgps.html#WAAS |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doesn't the GPS give you 'altitude' -- computed as height above the
surface of an ellipsoid? Or does it correct for mean sea level? There seem to be several computations required to derive true altitude from the raw GPS altitude coordinate and it is not clear to me if particular GPS receivers perform this adjustment. (I would hope that an aeronautical GPS receiver would perform this adjustment!) As for my decidedly non-aeronautical-non-WAAS-enabled Magellan 410 GPS, it rarely correlates very closely to known altitude benchmarks when I try it, even with many satellites 'locked.' God help anyone who attempts a precision approach with my GPS! Steve bob mologna wrote: I was on top of Lugnaqilla mountain in Ireland today and the GPS (Meridiam Plat) put it at 925 - 924 metres. The topo puts it at 925. Just lucky maybe... "Craig Davidson" wrote in message .net... Jay Honeck wrote in message ... How accurate is GPS for determining altitude, now that WAAS is active? I was in the air over five hours yesterday, and while droning along found that our new AvMap's altitude readout was just about dead-nuts accurate -- it was maybe 50 feet off, at times. In fact, due to the constantly changing barometric pressure along our route of flight, there were times when I might have trusted it before my altimeter. Anyone know how precise it is now? -- Jay, The FAA seems to say 3 meters vertical throughout the majority of the continental U.S. and portions of Alaska: http://gps.faa.gov/Programs/WAAS/waas.htm But the site below says 6 meters (95 percent of the time) with a worst case of 15.7 meters. http://users.erols.com/dlwilson/gpswaas.htm Here are some more interesting sites: http://waas.stanford.edu/old_metrics.html http://waas.stanford.edu/ http://www.edu-observatory.org/gps/dgps.html#WAAS |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
steve writes:
Doesn't the GPS give you 'altitude' -- computed as height above the surface of an ellipsoid? Or does it correct for mean sea level? There seem to be several computations required to derive true altitude from the raw GPS altitude coordinate and it is not clear to me if particular GPS receivers perform this adjustment. I think that most of them use WGS84, which is a little more complex than a simple ellipsoid. All the best, David |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"David Megginson" wrote in message
... steve writes: Doesn't the GPS give you 'altitude' -- computed as height above the surface of an ellipsoid? Or does it correct for mean sea level? There seem to be several computations required to derive true altitude from the raw GPS altitude coordinate and it is not clear to me if particular GPS receivers perform this adjustment. I think that most of them use WGS84, which is a little more complex than a simple ellipsoid. Some models (Garmin's included) display orthometric (above the geoide or roughly above mean sea level) by using a look up table for the geode height, and some other models display the ellipsoid altitude. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "David L. Wilson" wrote in message t... "David Megginson" wrote in message ... steve writes: Doesn't the GPS give you 'altitude' -- computed as height above the surface of an ellipsoid? Or does it correct for mean sea level? There seem to be several computations required to derive true altitude from the raw GPS altitude coordinate and it is not clear to me if particular GPS receivers perform this adjustment. I think that most of them use WGS84, which is a little more complex than a simple ellipsoid. Some models (Garmin's included) display orthometric (above the geoide or roughly above mean sea level) by using a look up table for the geode height, and some other models display the ellipsoid altitude. And it should also be injected into this thread that Delta won't be doing blind approaches with SP IIIs. As has been pointed out in many, many threads, there's GPSRs, and there's GPSRs, and that second set has 2 or three more zeros on the end. Frank |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() steve wrote: Doesn't the GPS give you 'altitude' -- computed as height above the surface of an ellipsoid? Or does it correct for mean sea level? There seem to be several computations required to derive true altitude from the raw GPS altitude coordinate and it is not clear to me if particular GPS receivers perform this adjustment. Most do but some do not. The computation required to derive true altitude is not complex but requires a table of data that can be very large. The math is simply to interprolate between table locations and provide a simple addition or subtraction to the ellipsoid altitude. You can determine if your receiver does this by looking at the NMEA data. Check my web site for an article on how to decode this information. You can compare the computed value with the accurate data that is avaialbe on government web sites to see how good the table is. Dale -- _ _ Dale DePriest /`) _ // http://users.cwnet.com/dalede o/_/ (_(_X_(` For GPS and GPS/PDAs |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
steve wrote:
Doesn't the GPS give you 'altitude' -- computed as height above the surface of an ellipsoid? Or does it correct for mean sea level? There seem to be several computations required to derive true altitude from the raw GPS altitude coordinate and it is not clear to me if particular GPS receivers perform this adjustment. See: http://edu-observatory.org/gps/height.html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question: Velocity/Cozy and high altitude | Shin Gou | Home Built | 6 | February 16th 05 02:03 AM |
Did the Germans have the Norden bombsight? | Cub Driver | Military Aviation | 106 | May 12th 04 07:18 AM |
Question: DP altitude vs MCA/MEA | Doug Easton | Instrument Flight Rules | 7 | April 7th 04 03:29 AM |
GPS Altitude with WAAS | Phil Verghese | Instrument Flight Rules | 42 | October 5th 03 12:39 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |