![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera writes:
If the TFR size is not set because of rational criteria, it is unreasonable on face, IMNSHO. If you start eliminating security measures based on rational criteria, about 95% of them will have to go out the window. Thanks for the chuckle, but what happens if Jr is bumped off first? Does Cheney's TFR automatically expand? That's part of the Single Integrated TFR Calculation Plan (SITFRC), and it is highly classified. -- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lockheed developing smaller Stand-Off Weapons | Eric Moore | Military Aviation | 1 | July 22nd 04 06:46 AM |
Are the Israelis using smaller Hellfire warheads? | Yeff | Military Aviation | 18 | April 22nd 04 10:07 PM |
Reasoning behind course reversal | Michael 182 | Instrument Flight Rules | 26 | February 27th 04 03:27 PM |
Minimum bending radius for 0.050" 6061-T6? | Bob Chilcoat | Home Built | 11 | February 5th 04 04:59 PM |
FORMATIONS, BOMB RUNS AND RADIUS OF ACTION | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 0 | August 10th 03 02:22 AM |