![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , C J Campbell wrote:
Pilots who like frangible rounds but can't get any of the government issue can easily make their own by loading .45 cal shot shells with bits of wire and small birdshot. These can be fired from a revolver, but not an automatic pistol. At close range the round will act just like a slug, but it will not penetrate wallboard, extremely thick clothing, airplane windows or aircraft aluminum. When I tried shot loads from a revolver, the seemed to spread at around a 30 degree angle. The only place it would "act like a slug" would be within an inch or two of the barrel. I always assumed that was because of the rifling. These were .38 instead of .45, but I can't imagine they act *that* much different. Do they? Mike Beede |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
F/A-22 to make appearance at U.S. Air Force Academy parade | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 14 | June 5th 04 11:11 PM |
Frangible bullets | C J Campbell | Piloting | 58 | January 6th 04 04:56 AM |