![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Earlier this week, while traversing the LAX VFR Shore Line Transition,
I was kept above 5,000 feet despite initially requesting a lower altitude (3,500'). One controller said that they had done a poor job in getting the word out to the pilot community regarding a change they have now adopted regarding the subject procedure. He indicated that ATC will not approve transitions below 5,000' any longer, however on a workload permitting basis, they will work VFR flights as IFR flights on the transition (which is what I got). On the return leg, the controller had me first climb from 4,500' to 5,500' then 6,500' and wanted to descend me once through the transition to put me below Class B airspace. (I declined, preferring the view at altitude; magnificent!) The VFR Terminal Area chart only says "altitude assigned by ATC." I have not yet been successful in locating web-based information on the procedure change. Likely it has not yet been published. I don't see a Letter To Airman: http://www.awp.faa.gov/lta/lta.cfm nor NOTAM: http://www.faa.gov/NTAP/NTAP04SEP30/C's.htm#California |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fulcrum low transition MPG | Pechs1 | Naval Aviation | 0 | October 7th 04 02:14 PM |
GPS and Beyond: The SatNav Transition for aviation | Kevin Horton | Home Built | 1 | September 22nd 04 09:34 PM |
AVIATIONTOOLBOX: recent FAA sectional scans | Kyler Laird | General Aviation | 6 | June 17th 04 04:10 AM |
61.57 Recent flight experience: Pilot in command | Julian Scarfe | Piloting | 11 | February 5th 04 02:06 PM |
Chicago Shoreline TFR | Ben Smith | Piloting | 23 | December 27th 03 09:28 PM |