![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A few years ago, as part of alignment with the European JAA requirements,
the UK introduced a requirement that is worded almost identically to 61.57, which requires three t/os and landings in the last 90 days to carry passengers. Before this rule came into effect, UK pilots who hadn't flown for some considerable time would often take along another non-instructor pilot, for example, a co-owner, in the right seat. It made more sense to fly accompanied by someone who was current than to fly solo. But the recent introduction of a currency rule now prohibits the carrying of this "passenger", forcing the pilot who wants to get back in 90-day currency to fly solo (or find a CFI to accompany). Is this also the way 61.57 is interpreted by the FAA? Julian Scarfe |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | April 1st 04 02:54 AM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |