![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've asked the following question to NewPiper Inc.
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 7:24 AM To: Flynn, Kathy L. Subject: PA34 200T question Dear Mrs / Ms Flynn I've called the italian dealer you gave my the number of. They made me talk with the dirigent who answered my question in the way I'll report Since I'm not fully satisfied by his answer I would like also your opinion. In the P.O.H. of the PA-34-200T, Seneca II I'm flying with, Section 7 - Description and operation, there is a NOTE which reports: "Do not operate with both selectors on "X-FEED."" Page 7-13 Issued August 23, 1976 Revised March 11, 1977 If such a note is present I suppose that something dangerous may happen if the prescription wouldn't be followed . It is straightforward that operating the airplane with both engines in x-feed is meaningless, but I would like to know which could be the consequence of operating both engines on X-FEED on the ground, other than wasting some of the returned fuel if the tanks are full. The italian dealer answered: "I don't know the answer but I think if you use both engines in x-feed they will stop for lack of fuel. In any case you don't need to worry about the x-feed pipeline integrity. It is checked yearly by mechanics, and also you'll never use it in your life." This was all his answer and it seems a little too generic to me and, maybe I'm wrong, I'm not sure He's aware of the precise technical consequence of the both engines x-feed operation. Since I'm going to fly as instructor on this plane I would like to know in deep detail all the consequences of the possible wrong actions. Your help would be really useful to me. Thank you for your attention, Silvio Mecucci Piper answer was: I our technical support reviewed your message and responded with following reply: * All aircraft per certification must be operated using the most current Pilot's Operating Handbook for their aircraft. * The New Piper Aircraft, Inc. recommends the aircraft to be operated per the approved current manual for the aircraft. * The New Piper Aircraft, Inc. will not speculate on what may happen if the aircraft is not operated per the most current correct POH. Thank you, Kathy Flynn THE NEW PIPER AIRCAFT, INC. And this was my last reply... Dear Mrs/Ms Flynn, I do agree with all the point you made and for sure I will operate the aircraft only according to the manual. Having made this last point certain, what I would like to know is the reason why Piper put that note in the manual. This doesn't mean I don't want to follow it.... The problem is that if I, as a flight instructor, say to someone "Never use it in this way." and that someone asks me "Why ?" I should be able to answer him something more complete than "Since this is what the manual says.". That's the reason why I've asked You a support in this. I can assure You that nothing of what You will write in the email (I hope you will answer me again) has a legal value here in Italy (yet), so could you please tell me the reason that note is present in the P.O.H. ? Silvio Mecucci No answer since then... Can anybody help me, or should I unassemble my Seneca II to get an answer ? Thank You all, Silvio Mecucci |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Seneca V vs. Navajo operating costs | Jarema | Owning | 1 | February 12th 05 10:30 PM |
Insuring a C310 vs. Piper Seneca | Dave | Owning | 17 | October 27th 04 03:29 PM |
Want to purchase PA34-200 Seneca | Grasshopper | General Aviation | 11 | July 7th 04 05:09 PM |
Seneca V question | DeltaDeltaDelta | Piloting | 5 | January 17th 04 02:44 PM |
I am going to do it again! A Piper Seneca? | Michelle P | Owning | 5 | August 20th 03 01:59 AM |