![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jonathan Gere wrote:
It did not count for a finish, because you didn't announce it on the radio. If you did call a finish, you are done after one lap and can't go on later. I'm not speaking of what WinScore will say, only of what the rules require. No, this is what the rules requi 11.2.2.4.4 If all claimed turnpoints are valid, and the pilot obtained a scored start time, a finish time prior to finish closing and landed at the contest site, then the pilot has completed the task. Please notice that this rule does NOT contain the phrase "and announced his start and finish on the radio". It is unambiguous that S's and F's "shall" be announced on the radio. No, it is unambiguous that start *times* shall be reported within 15 minutes of a start, and it does not have to be on the radio (see rule 10.8.8.3). Finishes are announced by the pilot only when a finish cylinder is used. With a finish line, the pilot only announces his approach: "(Contest ID) four miles". Maybe it can be a finish, but you take a penalty for not announcing. Now you are getting closer. It *is* a valid finish, and *maybe* you will get a penalty for not announcing it on the radio. If a pilot repeatedly refused to follow the radio procedures defined in the rules, the Contest Director could make a good case for awarding a penalty for unsafe flying or unsportsmanlike conduct. But I would have a low opinion of any CD that handed out such a penalty automatically on first offense without considering the circumstances. On day 7 of the 2002 USA 15m Nats at Tonopah, Bill Bartell experienced a double battery failure while on task: his primary battery became unplugged, and his backup battery had a low charge. He turned off his radio, his only vario, and his flight computer, saving his few remaining electrons for the flight recorder. Bill finished and landed silently, winning the day and moving into first place overall. Would you have given him distance points only, or a penalty for not calling "four miles"? One day at the 2001 USA 15m Nats at Uvalde, the finish was so crowded that the radio was squealing constantly from multiple pilots stepping on each other trying to call "four miles", and Charlie Lite trying to acknowledge each call. During the less than 2 minutes it took me to fly at redline from "four miles out" to the finish line, there was not one moment of clear frequency in which to announce my approach, and I chose not to step on some other pilot's announcement. Would you have given me a penalty? Suppose S(tart)=F(inish)=TP C. No designated turn MAT. You fly S-A-B-(FSC)-A-B-(FSC)-A-B-(FSC)-A-B-F (i.e. 11 TPs - 4 times around a triangle) then after landing claim the best scoring of any one of 10 combinations of consecutive laps: 1,1+2,1+2+3,1+2+3+4,2,2+3,2+3+4,3,3+4,or 4. Will this work? Can you openly announce all 4 S's and all 4 F's on the radio to avoid the penalties for not doing so, and choose which to discard by leaving them off your landing card? There is nothing in the rules to prevent this scheme, but practical considerations make it a useless strategy. Firstly, any of the lap combinations that took significantly less than the minimum task time would likely score very low. And since maximum start altitude and minimum finish altitude are never the same, in order to make an efficient finish and an efficient start between each lap, you would have to finish at minimum finish altitude and immediately pull up into a good thermal, climbing to maximum start altitude before exiting the start cylinder, all without wasting time searching for lift. It is therefore unlikely that any combination of laps other than 1+2+3+4 would have both an efficient start and an efficient finish. And if any number of laps less than four is sufficient to use up the minimum task time, you will be beaten by the pilot who did a better job of "bracketing" the day by not flying as far as your four laps. If so, why do so many pilots go undertime on no turn MAT's, when they could easily bank insurance laps during the start gate roulette? Perhaps those pilots are not as adept as you are at mis-interpreting the rules or devising poor racing strategies. Gary Ittner P7 "Have glider, will race" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Legal question - Pilot liability and possible involvement with a crime | John | Piloting | 5 | November 20th 03 09:40 PM |
Special Flight Setup Question (COF) | Dudley Henriques | Simulators | 4 | October 11th 03 12:14 AM |
History of Contest Scoring | Bill Feldbaumer | Soaring | 8 | October 8th 03 02:14 PM |
new TASKs and SCORING - or roll the dice | CH | Soaring | 0 | August 10th 03 07:32 AM |