![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Smith wrote:
In fact, working the numbers, I don't see how those takeoff minimums are possibly within TERPS limits. The 1008' tower is 4000 feet from the departure end of the runway, 1000 feet off the extended centerline, and 550 feet above the airport elevation. I make that a 550 ft/nm climb gradient. To put that in perspective, at 76 KIAS (Vy in an Archer or 172), you'd need a 980 ft/min climb rate to clear the tower (OK, you do a little better at Vx). How can this be legal? Roy: perhaps this is an oversight, with the minimums predating the tower? Have you considered calling someone to enquire about this? Just a suggestion, Sydney |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SBD Makes Deadstick Landing | Orval Fairbairn | Home Built | 11 | November 22nd 04 03:49 AM |
Must the PLANE be IFR-equipped to fly over17,500? | john smith | Home Built | 11 | August 27th 04 02:29 AM |
Another Aviation Story | Andy Asberry | Home Built | 23 | March 1st 04 06:24 PM |
airspace G | Jim Anglin | Home Built | 8 | February 22nd 04 11:29 PM |
CAD outline of Rans S6S instrument panel? | Rob Turk | Home Built | 2 | October 21st 03 09:27 PM |