![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've heard that some pilots have the authority to descend to CAT II
minimums (RA100) on CAT I intstrument approaches. If this is true, then how is the CAT I approach altered? Is the DH simply lowered? Seems like this would result in steeper approach angles to make it work out right. Alternately it seems possible that the DH is lowered farther along the inbound course...but wouldn't this make it more difficult to transition out of the cockppit and land? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The perfect approach | Capt.Doug | Home Built | 25 | December 3rd 04 03:37 AM |
LSA Approach speeds | Ace Pilot | Home Built | 0 | February 3rd 04 05:38 PM |
Why is ADF required on ILS approach? | Rich Raine | Instrument Flight Rules | 27 | August 1st 03 05:14 PM |
NDB approaches -- what are they good for? | Dylan Smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 15 | July 10th 03 09:15 PM |
Download approach charts | Ron Natalie | Home Built | 0 | July 9th 03 08:29 PM |