|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#23
May 19th 05, 04:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
"Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message ups.com... But runnnig your engine at 30" at 15,000 feet is MUCH harder on the engine than running 30" at 5,000 feet. The engine runs hotter and harder. (Where are you getting this information from?) No, it isn't. MOF, it's probably easier as the air temp is colder and thus aerodynamic cooling of the engine compartment will be more efficient. Matt (TN Beech B36) --------------------- Matthew W. Barrow Site-Fill Homes, LLC. Montrose, CO The lower ambient temperatures don't compensate for the decreased mass flow. Temperatures rise with altitude. It is a big issue for the preasurized piston planes flying over FL250. Mike MU-2 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: Duo Discus Turbo - Texas, USA | Mark Zivley | Soaring | 2 | May 5th 05 12:34 AM |
| turbo stc? | The Weiss Family | Owning | 21 | October 3rd 04 11:35 PM |
| Turbo prop AT-6/SNJ? | frank may | Military Aviation | 11 | September 5th 04 03:51 PM |
| Turbo 182: correct mixture for final approach at high altitude? | Barry Klein | Piloting | 38 | January 15th 04 04:25 AM |
| A36 Bonanza turbo prop | Jeff | Owning | 46 | January 7th 04 03:37 PM |
Threaded Mode