![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cessna and Cirrus brought one of each to the Angel Flight fly-in at PNS
yesterday, and I got the sales pitch from each rep. No test flights, alas. Both are highly desirable airplanes, of course, but I was surprised at how closely I rated them as a potential buyer: * Speed: Cirrus wins big: 40+ KTAS faster. The Cessna rep. claimed 135 for the Skylane, which seems a bit pokey for an airframe that has supposedly had an extensive aerodynamic cleanup. * Cost: 182 wins big: ~$100k lower sticker price and $3.5k insurance premium vs. $8k(!) for the SR-22. The Cirrus guy said mine might be as much as $1.5k lower since I have 1,000 hours, an instrument rating and 600+ hours of retract time. * Useful load: Slight edge to the 182; 1213 lbs. vs. 1150 lbs. * ROC: Cirrus wins big; 1,400 fpm vs. 923 fpm. * Takeoff/Landing performance: 182 wins big. Although they are pretty close on takeoff, the Skylane is 1,000' better landing over a 50' obstacle. * Interior: Very slight edge to Cirrus. It's a bit roomier, and the accessibility of controls and switches without a yoke in the way is very good. The 182 was very nice inside, too. The redesigned instrument panel puts the switches easily to hand, and they have nice big handles and labels. The no-nonsense metal panel is a great improvement over the old plastic crap - overall, the interior gives the impression of utility and durability. With the seat at max. vertical adjustment, the view over the glare shield seems a bit better than in older Skylanes. * Avionics: A tie. The displays looked terrific in full daylight. The 182 does not have XM weather on the Garmin MFD yet, but Cessna says it will be added at no cost when it's available. For now, 182s are delivered wit a B/K KAP-140 autopilot; later models will have a new Garmin ap built into the G-1000. So if I were of a mind to plunk down a few hundred large for a new piston single, I might have trouble choosing between these two very nice rides. The SR-22 is more airplane, but it's a lot more money, too. Cessna has done a fine job modernizing the 182, IMO, and I'd be very happy to own one. -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Iced up Cirrus crashes | Dan Luke | Piloting | 136 | February 16th 05 07:39 PM |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
Cirrus SR22 Purchase advice needed. | C J Campbell | Piloting | 122 | May 10th 04 11:30 PM |
Cirrus attracting pilots with 'The Wrong Stuff'? | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 73 | May 1st 04 04:35 AM |
IdaFlieg or manufacturer data for Open Cirrus | dj | Soaring | 2 | October 19th 03 07:56 PM |