![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, I just wanted to ensure I wasn't breaking any FAR, so naturally
I looked in the FARs. The departure procedure can take you miles out of your way, so yes, I'll forgo the obstacle protection when I can clearly manoeuvre on a good weather day Stan On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 20:46:10 GMT, "Bob Gardner" wrote: The regulations are probably the worst place to look for answers to procedural questions. Try reading AIM 5-2-6 in its entirety. That "immediate turn" should be no lower than 400' agl. Second, you are forgoing the obstacle protection afforded by the DP. Not real wise IMHO. Bob Gardner wrote in message .. . I was always under the assumption that if my atc clearance received on the ground was direct to a fix, I was free to forgo the departure procedure and do an immediate turn after takeoff. I note that FAR 91.129, Operations in class D airspace states that: "(g) Departures. No person may operate an aircraft departing from an airport except in compliance with the following: (1) Each pilot must comply with any departure procedures established for that airport by the FAA." So how, on a good weather delay, can one avoid flying the departure procedure? Note the word "established" vice "assigned" Stan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |