![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter R. wrote:
Dave Butler ) wrote: I assume you meant "...to match your current heading". Yes. directs the AP to turn in the direction you turned the heading bug, away form the desired course. Left alone, the AP will soon turn back and re- intercept the desired course. If you turned the heading bug in the direction to match your current *heading*, and and the AP turns in the direction you turned the heading bug, That turn will be *toward*, not away from the desired course. No, that is not what I am saying. The AP is already tracking the current course, which results in maintained heading. However, the heading bug happens to be five degrees to either side of the current heading. This could either be because of a crosswind or perhaps DG precession. If the pilot moves the heading bug to match the current heading, which is also the course being tracked by the AP, the AP momentarily turns *away* from the desired course. OK, I don't want to beat this greasy spot where there used to be a dead horse, but I think it's important that we not misinform someone who might be reading this and trying to learn from it. What you are saying may be correct, if it's behavior peculiar to the KAP140. It is definitely counter-intuitive to me, and not the way APs that I have used behave. Maybe we're just tripping over imprecise use of terminology, so let's be very precise in the words we use. Sometimes an example is easier to understand than just discussing the principle in the abstract, so permit me to concoct an example. Example: We want to follow an airway that goes TO a navaid along that navaid's 180 radial. That is, the desired course is 360, along the 180 radial from the navaid. There is a wind from the west. The DG and the magnetic compass have been adjusted so that they are in agreement. We manually (no autopilot) maneuver the aircraft so that it is centered on the 180 radial and heading 360. The OBS is set to 360, and the heading bug is set to 360. The CDI is centered. Now turn on the autopilot. The heading is 360, but the wind from the west results in a track of (say) 010. The CDI starts moving to the left as we drift off the desired track to the right. The autopilot responds to the left-moving CDI by changing the heading to the left, say 350. There may be some overshoot or some oscillation, but eventually the whole system comes to some equilibrium where the nose is pointed (heading) to the left of 360, and the track is more or less aligned with the desired track, but offset to the right. For argument, lets say the track is now 360 (but offset slightly to the right of the radial) and the heading is 350. [Nitpickers will argue that the track won't be exactly 360, and they're right, but it doesn't affect the argument.] OK so far? Now, I assert that if the pilot turns the heading bug to the left to 350 to match the heading, the aircraft will turn to the left and will take up a new equilibrium heading. The new equilibrium track is closer to the desired radial than the track was when the heading bug was set to 360. It seems to me you are saying something different. Please confirm. Thanks. Dave Remove SHIRT to reply directly. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Details on Wittman Buttercup | Charlie | Home Built | 1 | November 25th 03 04:19 AM |
Looking for a home for C130 autopilot amplifier... | tongaloa | Home Built | 0 | August 18th 03 06:44 PM |
Kinda OT but... Trying to flog a Sperry SP 20 autopilot servo ampfor C130... | tongaloa | Home Built | 0 | August 8th 03 07:45 PM |
Oshkosh Rec.Aviation Get-together details... | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 2 | August 3rd 03 04:31 PM |