![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gotta agree with Larry. The whole thing smacks of vertical descent path, not
lateral alignment. Poorly written, for sure. Should at least have had quotation marks surrounding the phrase between "From" and "degrees." Bob Gardner "Greg Esres" wrote in message ... One of our local pilots misunderstood a common Notam, as shown below. He thought the "ADD: From Shelby to RW 17: 3.52 degrees" meant add 3.52 degrees to the final approach course. How reasonable do you think his interpretation? (BTW, the notam just adds a descent gradient to a NP approach.) FDC 3/0143 M01 FI/T GENERAL DEWITT SPAIN, MEMPHIS, TN. VOR RWY 16, ORIG...CHANGE ALL REFERENCES TO RWY 16/34 TO RWY 17/35. ADD: FROM SHLBY TO RW 17: 3.52 DEGREES, TCH 31. ADD NOTE: VGSI AND DESCENT ANGLES NOT COINCIDENT. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Carefull of NOTAMS on NavCanada website | Ross Magnaldo | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | October 11th 03 12:46 AM |
| ILS Notam question | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 6 | August 23rd 03 12:53 AM |
| "GPS Unreliable" NOTAM | Robert Henry | Instrument Flight Rules | 20 | July 23rd 03 02:00 AM |