![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
With all these questions about how to integrate GPS into our everyday
operations, I'm tempted to believe we have allowed the advent of this wonderful new technology to send our thinking back to the dark ages! We want GPS to simply replace everything else - then all that "legacy" stuff just becomes a backup, in case the GPS signal or on-board equipment should become unreliable. This presents problems - as has been pointed out in the above threads - as we are not usually flying airways and overlays (at least that's the idea) so transitioning to the "legacy" stuff is not always that quick and easy, especially in high workload moments like approaches or missed approach procedures. I don't know why we don't simply weave GPS into the RNAV web that was already part of our mentality before GPS came along. With one integrator box, receiving signals from VOR/DME/ILS/eLORAN and GPS we could fly random routes, RNAV waypoints and approaches even with one primary system (GPS for example) inoperative or unreliable. An in-flight failure of one such system would still leave us with full RNAV capability, but might be our clue to fly an overlay, such that the (unlikely) failure of a second system would make transitioning easier. We consider the old KNS-80 style RNAV boxes to be obsolete today - but in a way they were more forward-looking than the way we're going about GPS today. G Faris |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|