![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Phil Miller" wrote in message ... Robert is being rediculess to claim that a pitot tube produces some total pressure and then the static port pressure is subtracted twice to make IAS. The whole point of using a static port is to be able to take the guts out of a pitot tube and produce only pitot pressure, thus increasing the reliability of the system. Perhaps this will help: "Tarver Engineering" wrote: "Gord Beaman" wrote in message .. . "Jim Knoyle" wrote: Hang on here a second now Jim, you still need two samples. As Dan says you need 'static pressure' to read the altitude from and you need 'pitot pressure' (ram air pressure) as well as the static pressure to derive the airspeed reading from. Sounds like you're saying that you can read 'both' from just the 'ram air pressure' alone. Or did I misunderstand you? Jim has finally figued out what a pitot tube is, but somehow he still wants to be correct in his archive troll. It is a great paradox. I know...ain't life a bitch John ![]() ![]() -- -Gord. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|