![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
(Andrew Sarangan) wrote: Is there an explanation for why small radii objects collect ice faster? The NASA icing video simply states this fact without giving an explanation. I have found the same with most other sources as well. "Roy Smith" wrote in message ... Here's a somewhat fuzzy/unscientific answer which may help at an intuitive level... A larger radius object disturbs the air a further distance out in front of it than a smaller object does. So, if a water droplet is sitting there suspended in the air, with the smaller object, it has less of a chance to get deflected up or down before the object slams into it. I don't think it's unscientific. It seems like a rather good scaling argument. The critical parameter is the ratio of the radius of the droplet to the radius of curvature of the object. For a very large ratio (e.g. 1, think baseball-sized droplet vs wing), you wouldn't expect the object to be much affected by the airflow around the object, and it will simply slam into the object. For a very small ratio (e.g. 10^-6), the droplet will simply follow the streamlines around the object. Thus it's clear that there is a dependence there. Julian Scarfe |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Which plane for 5 small pax? | Adam Aulick | Home Built | 46 | August 18th 04 03:44 PM |