![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Barry" wrote in message ... Here's a real-world scenario that I've encountered: VOR 22 approach to GED (Georgetown, DE): http://www.naco.faa.gov/d-tpp/publis...s/00935V22.PDF Coming from the northeast, on the 057 radial inbound to ATR (Victor 308), Dover Approach says "cross Waterloo at 3000, cleared for the VOR 22 approach". Since my course is now 237, I'm only three degrees off the final approach course of 234. There's no "No PT" sector shown, and the charted hold in lieu of a PT would put me on the 033 radial, with a 23 degree turn at the FAF. Obviously it makes no sense to do a turn in the hold, and Dover didn't expect me to, but some people would claim it's required. Is Dover doing anything contrary to 7110.65? Nope. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Boeing 757 turn rate? | Garyurbach | Aerobatics | 6 | June 14th 04 04:43 PM |
Interesting Departure Procedu MRB Trixy Two | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 26 | February 18th 04 11:42 PM |
Calculating vertical time and distance in a stall turn (US Hammerhead) | Dave | Aerobatics | 3 | November 20th 03 10:48 AM |
Instrument Approaches and procedure turns.... | Cecil E. Chapman | Instrument Flight Rules | 58 | September 18th 03 10:40 PM |