![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 23 Mar 2006 06:38:39 -0800, "gregscheetah"
wrote: Hello, I want to practice maneuvers, descending turns and basic manual maneuvering in IMC conditions. Is it possible to get ATC to assign you a 'practice area' in real IMC environment? Say a block of airspace like they do for aerobatics? Of course I would first do this with a CFII. Previous all my maneuvering in the clouds has been during real approaches close to the ground. All of my IFR flying is single pilot. I have had a few cases when alone I have had to make the procedure turn reversal and descend at the same time and I was definitely uncomfortable with the smoothness of the descending turn. I would Work on the scan until your are comfortable with it. This kind of maneuver I'd do with a safety pilot until you can nail the turns and altitude. focus on bank angle and descent rate and I would pass through the bearing, or I would allow the bank rate to go beyond standard rate. Nothing significant, 10 degrees on bearing and maybe 10 deg on bank angle, no loss of control or serious deviations. Everything would work About a month (give or take) before I took my check ride my instructor took me out for over two hours of nothing but partial panel with only one radio and no DME. We did *timed* climbing and descending turns to predetermined altitudes and headings. He'd give me a heading of say 090 at 3000 and once stabilized it was "climbing left turn to 180 at 4000. I had to calculate the time to climb and then figure the rate of turn. (or conversely the time to turn and then rate of climb). I was expected to hit the heading and altitude at the same time. Of course to make it interesting he sometimes would have me intercept an radial inbound, out bound, or just a heading. Things like descend and intercept the 300 degree radial inbound on a 30 degree angle at 3000. Of course we might intercept from the left one time and the right the next. And no, I didn't get to use a calculator.:-)) Naturally it was one of those warm days with thermals and about a 15 knot, 90 degree cross wind. OF course the NDB holding pattern that started at 7000 with descents of 500 or 1000 feet per circuit down to the approach at 2400, followed by the published approach, followed by the published missed, then back up to 3000, intercept the VOR-A into 3BS outbound, procedure turn, 3 or 4 circuits of the holding pattern still partial panel and one nav radio. At the end of that I was pretty well rung out, but I had no more problems with climbing or descending turns. out OK, but I was not comfortable and it was not acceptable performance for me. I have since limited maneuvers in IMC to either turning, or descending, but not both. This works well, but I know that sometime I You'll get used to them with practice. will get to do both again. Most of my approaches are either VOR or NDB. ILS approaches are a piece of cake. I can do it perfectly (well, acceptable and without error) under the hood. I just finished a 3 hour run with a CFII under the hood and everything was perfect. There is something different about maneuvering in the clouds. Only attitude. I find it easier in the clouds with the exception of small cumulus where you end up with flicker. Typically *most* rides are smoother in the clouds than they were under the hood and in sunshine. There were a couple of notable and memorable exceptions. I know I could get a CFII in actual conditions with close to min ceilings, and practice maneuvers during the approach, but that doesn't sound smart to me. I don't care how good the CFII is, loss of control in IMC at 800 feet above the ground is going to be ugly. I want to practice with a bunch of air below me. Certainly you want to get so you can do the maneuvers well before getting down to minimums, but it sounds to me like you are too concerned. By that I do not mean don't be concerned. Get proficient and *comfortable*. My instructor had me flying full, published approaches with procedure turns and holds right down to minimums in IMC to the point where my first flight on my own after getting the rating was right down to minimums with much of the area below minimums. Had I had to go missed on the VOR I'd have gone over to MBS for the ILS. Barring that I had enough gas to get me back to reasonably good weather with VFR conditions under the clouds. The point is, I was comfortable under those conditions. To me that flight was no different than any of the training flights down to minimums. OTOH I readily admit that I am not currently proficient enough to do that kind of flying. Of course I fly perfectly with the AP enabled ![]() If you have a good AP most of your IMC flying will be with it on, just don't become dependent on it. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com Thanks, Greg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A Question For Real Airline Pilots | Blue | Simulators | 34 | September 6th 04 01:55 AM |
The Real Enemy Staring Us in the Face | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 2 | July 12th 04 06:18 PM |
Real weather GPS | ANTHONY ROTHSCHILD | Simulators | 2 | July 1st 04 06:40 PM |
I'm a real PILOT! | CFLav8r | Piloting | 45 | April 26th 04 03:29 PM |
Virtual Airline sues Real Airline | Joseph Brown | Simulators | 4 | April 25th 04 09:10 PM |