![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 05/02/06 15:43, M wrote:
The clearance came well outside the approach fix, but at an altitude below the GS intercept altitude on the IAP. It's also below the GS altitude at the marker. The problem with this clearance is there's no way I can verify my altimeter as I cross the marker. Normally on during an ILS approach, we're suppose to check the altitude on the GS as we cross the marker, and make sure it agrees with the GS altitude over the marker printed on the IAP. This is an important crosscheck of the altimeter settings. Well, once you were cleared for the approach and established on the initial approach segment, you can fly the altitudes published for the approach - so couldn't you have climbed to 2100'? -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane Cal Aggie Flying Farmers Sacramento, CA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
Pressure Altitude and Terminology | Icebound | Piloting | 0 | November 27th 04 09:14 PM |
GPS Altitude with WAAS | Phil Verghese | Instrument Flight Rules | 42 | October 5th 03 12:39 AM |
GPS Altitude with WAAS | Phil Verghese | Piloting | 38 | October 5th 03 12:39 AM |