A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Approach Timing



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old September 8th 04, 02:58 AM
C Kingsbury
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Howard Nelson" wrote in message . com...

I really, really, really would recommend flying an airspeed under all
circumstances.


Ditto. Planes fly airspeed, not groundspeed. I was taught to fly
standard configurations of pitch, power, and trim. These should
produce known airspeeds which set the plane up well for the specific
phase of flight.

Do you use the distance to the airport to determine/verify the MAP, even
though the time may not have expired?


Legally your IFR approved clock for timed approaches and NDB for NDB
approaches are what you WILL use. Rationally if my clock or NDB disagreed
with my GPS and I had to make a choice I would trust the GPS.


The conservative choice would be to listen to the first box that cries
"miss." Let's say the wind shifts and your groundspeed changes, the
handheld says you're there. Might be good to miss it. If OTOH the
clock says you're there and the GPS doesn't, you're not going to
increase your risks by missing on that basis.

I can understand the FAA wanting to avoid a free for all by regulating GPS
usage so carefully. But each pilot, if faced with conflicting data, needs to
decide which technology they trust their life to. The best way to do that is
lots of practice under VFR checking clock vs. GPS, NDB vs. GPS, VOR vs. GPS,
Localizer vs. GPS and make up your own mind.


I use handheld GPS and panel Loran to cross-check everything else in
my non GPS-equipped C-172.

Like you say, there's no way the FAA will ever allow handheld GPS as
an official navigational device for IFR, but they've also made a wise
decision to not prevent it from being used anyway. A Decent handheld
GPS and COM radio give a pilot a fighting chance to get down through
the clouds in a total electrical failure, which is one of the
emergencies I worry about most in a middle-aged plane like mine. (NB-
I have a Precise Flight standby vacuum already)

Also if you are not a renter you might consider spending 15-20K for an IFR
certified GPS linked to your autopilot.


You could probably put a good used box in for a lot less, though
perhaps not linked to the A/P. 6K range for a used King/Apollo unit +
install/certification is the estimate I've seen from multiple sources
for a 172.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VOR/DME Approach Question Chip Jones Instrument Flight Rules 47 August 29th 04 05:03 AM
Approach Question- Published Missed Can't be flown? Brad Z Instrument Flight Rules 8 May 6th 04 04:19 AM
Procedure Turn Bravo8500 Instrument Flight Rules 65 April 22nd 04 03:27 AM
Why is ADF or Radar Required on MFD ILS RWY 32 Approach Plate? S. Ramirez Instrument Flight Rules 17 April 2nd 04 11:13 AM
IR checkride story! Guy Elden Jr. Instrument Flight Rules 16 August 1st 03 09:03 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.