![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Howard Nelson" wrote in message . com...
I really, really, really would recommend flying an airspeed under all circumstances. Ditto. Planes fly airspeed, not groundspeed. I was taught to fly standard configurations of pitch, power, and trim. These should produce known airspeeds which set the plane up well for the specific phase of flight. Do you use the distance to the airport to determine/verify the MAP, even though the time may not have expired? Legally your IFR approved clock for timed approaches and NDB for NDB approaches are what you WILL use. Rationally if my clock or NDB disagreed with my GPS and I had to make a choice I would trust the GPS. The conservative choice would be to listen to the first box that cries "miss." Let's say the wind shifts and your groundspeed changes, the handheld says you're there. Might be good to miss it. If OTOH the clock says you're there and the GPS doesn't, you're not going to increase your risks by missing on that basis. I can understand the FAA wanting to avoid a free for all by regulating GPS usage so carefully. But each pilot, if faced with conflicting data, needs to decide which technology they trust their life to. The best way to do that is lots of practice under VFR checking clock vs. GPS, NDB vs. GPS, VOR vs. GPS, Localizer vs. GPS and make up your own mind. I use handheld GPS and panel Loran to cross-check everything else in my non GPS-equipped C-172. Like you say, there's no way the FAA will ever allow handheld GPS as an official navigational device for IFR, but they've also made a wise decision to not prevent it from being used anyway. A Decent handheld GPS and COM radio give a pilot a fighting chance to get down through the clouds in a total electrical failure, which is one of the emergencies I worry about most in a middle-aged plane like mine. (NB- I have a Precise Flight standby vacuum already) Also if you are not a renter you might consider spending 15-20K for an IFR certified GPS linked to your autopilot. You could probably put a good used box in for a lot less, though perhaps not linked to the A/P. 6K range for a used King/Apollo unit + install/certification is the estimate I've seen from multiple sources for a 172. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Approach Question- Published Missed Can't be flown? | Brad Z | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | May 6th 04 04:19 AM |
Procedure Turn | Bravo8500 | Instrument Flight Rules | 65 | April 22nd 04 03:27 AM |
Why is ADF or Radar Required on MFD ILS RWY 32 Approach Plate? | S. Ramirez | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | April 2nd 04 11:13 AM |
IR checkride story! | Guy Elden Jr. | Instrument Flight Rules | 16 | August 1st 03 09:03 PM |