![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I use taxing to active all the time. I can't see the wind sock from where my
hangar is, so I have no idea what runway I am going to use. This serves several purposes, which I guess is why CFIs teach students to do this. 1. As someone already mentioned, it avoids two planes getting stuck like goats on a mountain trail while taxiing between hangers. 2. It lets approaching aircraft know there is ground activity, so that the approaching aircraft and ground/departing aircraft can avoid using the runway at the same time. If I am approaching a field and I have heard ground traffic, I am going to be sure to identify their location before turning final. It would be better to say clear of 28 instead of clear of active. I prefer someone saying "clear of active" rather than "clear of ... uh...what was that... clear of 28." At a controlled airport, saying clear of active lets the controller know he can now give a takeoff clearance to any planes waiting for departure. I guess this probably comes into play when visibility is low and the tower can't see the planes leaving the runway. I suppose this may not be necessary at some small uncontrolled fields, but it is probably a bad idea to alter your procedure based on field size and field visibility. If we took your suggestions, and did not announce clear of active at small fields, than you would get a bunch of pilots trained on small fields not announcing clear of active when they flew into large controlled fields when it is necessary. This logic is the same reason I do my GUMPS check even when flying fixed gear aircraft. "Bela P. Havasreti" wrote in message ... CFIs, will you please, PLEASE stop teaching students this stuff?!!! 8^) On 122.75: Making 30+ second long position reports, 4500 feet over some non-descript / podunk town. More annoying when the broadcaster does so in broken english. Even more annoying when the broadcaster does so every 5 minutes! On CTAF: Announcing that you're taxiing from your parking spot to "the active runway" at an airport that's the size of an ex-WW2 air base. Who cares? On CTAF: Announcing that you're "Clear of the active". You might think anyone who is waiting to take off can *see* when you're clear. The only exception I can think of is a (severely) crowned runway where the other end can't be seen from the departure end. I'll think of some more later.... grins Bela P. Havasreti |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MX385 Radio removal | Marty from Florida | Owning | 3 | May 24th 13 08:26 AM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
I Hate Radios | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 9 | June 6th 05 05:39 PM |
1944 Aerial War Comes to Life in Radio Play | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | March 25th 04 10:57 PM |
Ham Radio In The Airplane | Cy Galley | Owning | 23 | July 8th 03 03:30 AM |