![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... So what does any of this have to do with a pilot flying without an autopilot? You mentioned the law of primacy. We should assume that even the pilot of an airplane without an autopilot may eventually fly with an autopilot, so therefore we should fly under a paradigm compatible with autopilot operation. It is impossible to use your method with an autopilot -- the pilot must understand the concept of forward vs. reverse sensing to fly an approach with an autopilot. I am quite sure an autopilot doesn't simply fly right towards a right needle some undetermined amount, and then turn some more when the needle doesn't move, as many pilots do who use your preferred method. Establishing a proper intercept angle can be done with either paradigm -- I don't see the issue here. In any event, I say again... flying a localizer approach with an autopilot requires understanding of the "forward" vs. "reverse" sensing algorithm. That is reason enough for all IFR pilots to use this paradigm. -------------------- Richard Kaplan www.flyimc.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|