![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter R." wrote in message ... Bill Denton ) wrote: The separation of VFR/IFR aircraft is not covered in this section; the separation of ALL aircraft is discussed in the previous section. Then why are you and I having this disagreement? You asked about separation of an aircraft flying at 6,000 feet, presumably on an IFR flight plan, I maintained all along about the fact that IFR flights are not separated from VFR flights and presented two scenarios where an IFR aircraft at 6,000 feet might encounter a VFR aircraft, yet you quote a passage that admittedly has nothing to do with my posts. No, the orignal poster presented the scenario. I simply pointed out that a 6000 feet he would be on an IFR flight plan, talking to ATC, and receiving traffic from ATC. You introduced the passage and misinterpreted it. I provided a correct interpretation. The purpose of this section is to remind VFR-on-top-pilots that while they are on an IFR flight plan, ATC has allowed them to deviate and fly under VFR rules (including see and avoid) and that ATC is not obligated to provide traffic guidance. I am not sure what your point about VFR-on-top is, but as a reminder to you, in the US VFR-on-TOP is a specific IFR clearance that must be requested. And if you are granted that clearance, you will be flying under what are essentially Visual Flight Rules, you will be allowed to deviate from your as-filed flight plan, and ATC is not obligated to provide traffic guidance outside of Class B's and TRSA's.They still have an open IFR flight plan; they must either cancel IFR, or they must rejoin that flight plan at a waypoint on the plan and continue fllying that flight plan. Simply being on an IFR flight plan in visual conditions is not the same as VFR-on-top. In the case of the IFR flight in VMC, the pilot is still guaranteed ATC separation between other IFR aircraft, but not VFR aircraft (excluding class B). Thus, to your question in your first post, an IFR aircraft at 6,000 feet is still at risk of a mid-air collision. But a pilot flying on a VFR flight plan is required to observe "see and avoid", and if he is observing it and taking appropriate evasive action, a collision cannot occur. Keep in mind that separation is not provided only by ATC traffic guidance and "see and avoid", it's also provided by "east is odd, west is even, VFR +500" altitudes and other things. -- Peter |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|