![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message news ![]() "Dan Luke" wrote in message ... You cannot do anything like that on my KLN-90B without suspending waypoint sequencing. That would seem to me to be a barrier to RNAV vectoring to final for ATC, since the variability of equipment in this respect cannot be accounted for. That would seem to suggest there IS something special about vectoring to final on GPS approaches. It would seem to suggest no such thing. You seem to think that FAAO 7110.65 is only advisory and that the design approach taken by some equipment manufacturer actually defines the rules you should use for vectoring aircraft to approaches. Perhaps you should become familiar with FAAO 7110.65 and the P/CG if you want to know about vectoring to final on GPS approaches. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Contact Approach -- WX reporting | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 64 | December 22nd 06 01:43 PM |
RNAV Operations in FS2004 | Rookie | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | November 29th 06 11:51 PM |
RNAV approaches | Kevin Chandler | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | September 18th 03 06:00 PM |
RNAV approaches | Kevin Chandler | Piloting | 3 | September 18th 03 06:00 PM |
Slam dunk into Janesville | Steven P. McNicoll | Piloting | 0 | July 31st 03 01:08 AM |