![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Folks-
Please forgive what is probably a simple question regarding GPS approaches. I am new the the /G world. I was out flying my 182P today to do some practice approaches. The airplane is equipped with a GNS480 and I have a Garmin 296 on the yolk. I was buzzing around NW of the Salinas airport on vectors and was told to expect the GPS13 approach as I requested. So far, so good. Fight plan entered into the 480 and the 296, approach loaded on both. Here's the approach: http://www.naco.faa.gov/d-tpp/0701/00363G13.PDF NorCal cleared me direct EWTOF at 3200, cleared for the approach. When looking at the approach on both the 480 and the 296, it seemed to commence at UBBEP rather than EWTOF. No way for me to go direct EWTOF then on to the rest of the procedure. So, I fiddled around a bit and was unable to come up with a graceful solution. Selecting Direct To, I was hoping to easily find EWTOF - no joy. I had to dig up EWTOF from the nearest list, and then the rest of the approach "disappeared." I ended up arming VTF on the 480, then used the 296 to navigate direct to EWTOF. By then, the VTF mode on the 480 picked me up properly and I was in good shape. Ugly, but it worked (fortunately, it was clear and a million). And how about that synthetic glidescope! Very cool! So, at first I figured that there was a problem with the database versus my Jepp chart. However, the problem repeated itself on the GPS31 approach to KRHV: http://www.naco.faa.gov/d-tpp/0701/05591R31R.PDF I was cleared direct ECYON, then for the approach. Both Garmins "wanted" me to head for OZNUM. What is the best way to handle this situation? Clearly I am doing something wrong, because this has to easier than I made it! Is it as simple as amending the current flight plan and inserting a waypoint before the destination? That is, in the first case, inserting EWTOF before KSNS on the flight plan and then choosing Direct To? I would think that EWTOF should be part of the procedure as it is charted on the approach plate. It sucks to have to enter it in by hand to the flight plan. Do all of the GPS approaches in the 480/296 database commence only with the FAF? Thanks for your insight. Cheers, --Chris Q. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
R172K Approach Configuration | facpi | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | January 5th 07 03:58 PM |
RNAV vectors | Dan Luke | Instrument Flight Rules | 74 | December 26th 06 10:31 PM |
Trust those Instruments.... Trust those Instruments..... | A Lieberman | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | May 2nd 06 03:54 PM |
Approach Question- Published Missed Can't be flown? | Brad Z | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | May 6th 04 04:19 AM |
Why is ADF or Radar Required on MFD ILS RWY 32 Approach Plate? | S. Ramirez | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | April 2nd 04 11:13 AM |