![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 5, 10:39 pm, Pat Flannery wrote:
Gordon wrote: When dozens of attack aircraft all strike the same warship within a few minutes, the TBD's performance wasn't an issue - they did make at least one strike on Soryu (?), recorded in the famous set of photos with a towering geyser forward. Practically everyone reported they hit the tiny carrier. Soryu wasn't tiny by any stretch of the imagination; she was around the size of Enterprise or Hornet. The hit shown is on Shoho, which along with Ryujo, were two of the smaller early Japanese carriers. Ahhh, obviously, that is the one I meant. Shoho - sorry. I got my carriers mixed up - hence the (?) in my reply. I know that the Soryu went down at Midway, I just momentarily got my "S"-carrier-names mixed up. Against modern fleet carriers, a motivated CAP, and no fighter support, Midway was a scalding reminder of just how unspectacular an aircraft the "Devastator" really was. You know, the Fairey Swordfish made the Devastator look like superplane, but at the attack on Taranto and against the Bismarck, they didn't exactly suck. They were never once sent in against an enemy fleet with an active CAP. Different war. They WERE outmoded, by any stretch or WWII standard. If they were sent in against the IJN carrier fleet under an umbrella of Zeroes, they would have been, well, devastated. We lost the Devastators due to the Japanese having their Zeros up and flying at low altitude. Yes. Going in to attack without any cover in a 100-mph straight and level torpedo plane was suicide, with predictable results. Would the attack have gone differently with Stringbags? If they hadn't been busy attacking the Devastators, those Dauntlesses coming in from above might have had a very tough time putting their bombs down as accurately as they did. Sheer unadulterated luck. And the plan didn't call for the TBDs to all be sacrificed - it was a busted plan and an obsolete aircraft that resulted in nearly 100% losses of the attacking force. The SBDs were not, at that point, even a part of the same attack, so giving them credit for 'keeping the Zeroes busy', makes it seem like that task was part of their job. We got incredibly lucky that the SBDs arrived overhead while the Japanese CAP was still busy hunting down the last survivors. Torpedo 6 and 8 didn't lose their lives in vain; by keeping the Zeros low and the AA gunners firing at them rather than looking up, they cleared the way for the SBD's to attack almost unopposed from above. That whole battle was about the flukiest piece of luck that came down on the U.S. side during the entire war. I completely agree. None of which makes the TBD anything other than a meatgrinder for crews. v/r Gordon |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"Airplanes don't kill people!, people kill people!" | Laonork | Owning | 8 | May 21st 12 05:56 AM |
Can MSFS Kill you? | Steve Foley | Piloting | 34 | December 8th 06 06:07 AM |
"Airplanes don't kill people!, people kill people!" | Flyingmonk | Piloting | 11 | May 17th 05 10:26 AM |
Kill Kill Kill | Dave LaCourse | Naval Aviation | 1 | January 17th 05 05:18 AM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |