![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
E Z Peaces wrote in
: Bertie the Bunyip wrote: More_Flaps wrote in news:0390ffd1-a85e-4ae3-8971- : On Jun 26, 3:00 pm, E Z Peaces wrote: The man said the problem was that he had failed to keep the stick back after touchdown. Does his recollection make sense? Nope Does actually. Little tailfraggers, and big ones, come to think of it, bounce along of you dont get the stick back after three pointing. the mains will thrust it back up into the air a bit and then the nose comes back down again repeating the cycle. Bertie Doesn't a three-point landing occur at stall speed? Not always. Isn't the plane going too slowly to lift off again? Besides, if the tail is that low, touching down won't increase the angle of attack, will it? If the tail is that low, you have th estick all the way back. You say the mains will thrust it back up into the air and the cycle will repeat. In a three-point landing, it seems it would take springs to make a plane rise. Aren't shock absorbers supposed to prevent that? Shock absorbers are for cars and they'r emade to dampen cycles such as that. Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Runway | J.F. | Aviation Photos | 14 | September 14th 07 04:24 PM |
Runway ID | Lakeview Bill | Piloting | 55 | October 18th 05 12:53 AM |
Runway needs of F4U and F-4 ???? | vincent p. norris | Naval Aviation | 8 | October 6th 05 07:18 PM |
Bouncing ammeter hand on 76 Warrior | Leo | Owning | 5 | December 5th 04 08:24 PM |
Runway in Use | Sniper@SDU | Simulators | 11 | October 8th 03 10:57 AM |