![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is this alarming?
In 1971 the Design Authority issued an Airworthiness Directive mandating the replacement of wing spigots on the Grob 102, following a failure on the Grob 103. Aircraft manufacturers/Design Authorities do not issue directives, which by their name are mandatory, for the fun of it, in fact doing so indicates that have screwed up. The work mandated is essential. Unless I have this completely wrong the FAA decided they knew better and did not pass this on. My concern is, how many other AD issued by Design Authorities have been ignored by the FAA and is it really safe to fly in a glider, or any other aircraft on the USA register? Can we be assured that essential safety maintenance has been done? Looking at the evidence of the Grob 102 the answer has to be no. Have the FAA ignored other ADs issued by European manufacturers, Airbus Industrie perhaps? Scary!!!!!!! At 00:23 16 August 2008, Gary Emerson wrote: I heard an AD was being considered for the wing spigots on the Grob 102s (US version AD). Any definite info on where this is headed and when? Thanks, Gary |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Grob G102 Astir Spar Spigot Assembly AD NPRM | BDS | Soaring | 4 | August 30th 07 04:13 PM |
Grob G102 Setup | BDS | Soaring | 11 | August 30th 05 03:42 PM |
Wheel Brake on G102 | Ken Pruchnick | Soaring | 4 | March 2nd 05 07:01 AM |