![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Dec 13, 1:34 pm, jcarlyle wrote:
...I then calculated the arithmetic mean chord of the LS8 wing by dividing span by aspect ratio, and got 700mm. This looks about right, since the root chord is 900mm, and yes, I know it's not the MAC. Then, I found a scale drawing of the LS8 at: http://www.dg-flugzeugbau.de/Data/3s-ls8-s.pdf If I'm reading it right, the 25% MAC will be located 225mm behind the wing LE... Hmm... That doesn't seem right. Using the DJ Aerotech graphical MAC method, the same LS8 drawing, and information on the LS8 from Thomas' Fundamentals of Sailplane Design (thanks again, Judah!) that places the planform break at 0.6 semispan, I got: * MAC length of ~736mm * MAC LE location of ~41mm aft of the wing LE at side of body _or_ * MAC LE location of ~45mm aft of the intersection of the projected leading edge and the plane of symmetry (yeah, who uses that?) Given that the LS8's double-trapezoid planform gives it more MAC per unit area than the HP-18's eminently buildable single trapezoid planform, and that the LS8's wing is unswept along the 25% chord line as opposed to the HP-18 being unswept along the 41.25% chord, the MAC and MAC LE numbers I got sound about right to me. But, hey, I'm a college dropout with no engineering training, what do I know? As regards the suggested CG location for the HP-series, Dick Schreder typically suggested 25% to 40% MAC as the allowable range. Based on an analysis of the margin of static stability of the HP-18 done by Steve Smith (that's Dr. Smith to you Mythbusters fans), and based on my own experience flying an HP-18 with CG back around 40%, I currently recommend that HP operators limit their operation to 25% to 35% MAC. For an extra 245 Europes, I will be glad to translate that into a dimensional range aft of the wing leading edge at side-of-body. For 245 Australias, I will do all the above and throw in a wisecracking reality-show cameraman. We are not accepting any other continents at this time. Thanks, and best regards to all Bob K. www.hpaircraft.com ---- now with 245% less ondulation! |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need a little more range for your 304S jet? | Marc Ramsey[_2_] | Soaring | 1 | July 22nd 07 02:39 PM |
| VOR volume range | kevmor | Instrument Flight Rules | 7 | February 7th 07 11:46 PM |
| Long range Wx | Paul kgyy | Piloting | 4 | December 31st 04 05:25 PM |
| What is the range of the B-1B? | user | Military Aviation | 10 | December 24th 03 05:15 AM |
| Fuel Range | Toks Desalu | Home Built | 2 | November 14th 03 01:51 PM |